Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 29.45.370 (2026)
Answer and objection
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 29.45.370. Answer and objection.
A person having an interest in a lot on the foreclosure list may file an answer within 30 days after the date of last publication, specifying the person's objection. The court shall make its decision in summary proceedings. The foreclosure list is prima facie evidence that the assessment and levy of the tax is valid and that the tax is unpaid.
A person having an interest in a lot on the foreclosure list may file an answer within 30 days after the date of last publication, specifying the person's objection. The court shall make its decision in summary proceedings. The foreclosure list is prima facie evidence that the assessment and levy of the tax is valid and that the tax is unpaid.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2009–2020 · leading case: Davin J. Anderson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp., 462 P.3d 19 (Alaska 2020).
Davin J. Anderson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp., 462 P.3d 19 (Alaska 2020). “As Anderson notes, AHFC 84 See AS 29.45.370. Another reason the municipal property tax foreclosure process is distinguishable from this case is that the government’s power to collect taxes is treated differently than its power to collect other kinds of debts.”
Lot 04B & 5C, Block 83 Townsite v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 208 P.3d 188 (Alaska 2009). “- Falke also argues that summary judgment was improper because AS 29.45.370's direction that the court "make its decision in summary proceedings" does not apply.”
Lot 04B & 5C Block 83 Townsite v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 261 P.3d 422 (Alaska 2011). “AS 29.45.370. 12 . AS 29.45.390(a). 13 . AS 29.”
Pursche v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, 371 P.3d 251 (Alaska 2016). “Purscile filed this objection pursuant to AS 29.45.370, which provides: "A person having an interest in a lot on the foreclosure list may file an answer within 30 days .”
Jimmie D. Lockhart, Sr. v. Mun. of Anchorage (Alaska 2012). “The Municipality again advised Lockhart that, in accordance with AS 29.45.370, he could file a written answer with the superior court if he disputed the petition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.