Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 29.45.390 (2026)
Transfer and appeal
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 29.45.390. Transfer and appeal.
(a) Foreclosed properties are transferred to the municipality for the lien amount. When answers are filed the court may enter judgment against and order the transfer to the municipality of all other properties on the list pending determination of the matters in controversy. The court shall hear and determine the issues raised by the complaint and answers in the same manner and under the same rules as it hears and determines other actions.
(b) The court clerk shall deliver a certified copy of the judgment and decree to the municipal clerk. The certified judgment and decree constitutes a transfer to the municipality.
(c) The judgment and decree stops objections to it that could have been presented before judgment and decree. Appeal from a judgment and decree of foreclosure, or from a final order in the proceeding, may be taken in a manner provided for appeals in civil actions.
(a) Foreclosed properties are transferred to the municipality for the lien amount. When answers are filed the court may enter judgment against and order the transfer to the municipality of all other properties on the list pending determination of the matters in controversy. The court shall hear and determine the issues raised by the complaint and answers in the same manner and under the same rules as it hears and determines other actions.
(b) The court clerk shall deliver a certified copy of the judgment and decree to the municipal clerk. The certified judgment and decree constitutes a transfer to the municipality.
(c) The judgment and decree stops objections to it that could have been presented before judgment and decree. Appeal from a judgment and decree of foreclosure, or from a final order in the proceeding, may be taken in a manner provided for appeals in civil actions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1993–2011 · leading case: Cool Homes, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough of Equalization, 860 P.2d 1248 (Alaska 1993).
Cool Homes, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough of Equalization, 860 P.2d 1248 (Alaska 1993). “Pursuant to AS 29.45.390(a), the court separated Cool Homes' property from the in rem proceeding and dealt with it separately.”
Lot 04B & 5C Block 83 Townsite v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 261 P.3d 422 (Alaska 2011). “AS 29.45.390(a). 13 . AS 29.45.380. 14 . AS 29.”
— Alaska Stat. § 29.45.390(a) — 2 cases
Cool Homes, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough of Equalization, 860 P.2d 1248 (Alaska 1993). “Pursuant to AS 29.45.390(a), the court separated Cool Homes' property from the in rem proceeding and dealt with it separately.”
Lot 04B & 5C Block 83 Townsite v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 261 P.3d 422 (Alaska 2011). “AS 29.45.390(a). 13 . AS 29.45.380. 14 . AS 29.”
— Alaska Stat. § 29.45.390(c) — 1 case
Lot 04B & 5C Block 83 Townsite v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 261 P.3d 422 (Alaska 2011). “AS 29.45.390(a). 13 . AS 29.45.380. 14 . AS 29.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.