Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 29.45.440 (2026)

Expiration

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 29.45.440. Expiration.
 (a) At least 30 days before the expiration of the redemption period the clerk or the clerk's designee shall publish a redemption period expiration notice. The notice must contain the date of judgment, the date of expiration of the period of redemption, and a warning that all properties ordered sold under the judgment, unless redeemed, shall be deeded to the municipality immediately on expiration of the period of redemption and that every right or interest of a person in the properties will be forfeited forever to the municipality. The notice appears once a week for four consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation distributed in the municipality. If there is no newspaper of general circulation distributed in the municipality, the notice is posted in three public places for at least four consecutive weeks. The clerk shall send a copy of the notice by certified mail to each record owner of property against which a judgment of foreclosure has been taken and, if the assessed value of the property is more than $10,000, to all holders of mortgages or other liens of record on the property. The notice shall be mailed within five days after the first publication. The mailing shall be sufficient if mailed to the property owner and to the holder of a mortgage or recorded lien at the last address of record.

 (b) The right of redemption expires 30 days after the date of the first notice publication.

 (c) Costs incurred in the determination of holders of mortgages and other liens of record and costs of notice publication incurred by a municipality under (a) of this section are a lien on the property and may be recovered by the municipality.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2011–2016 · leading case: Tagaban v. City of Pelican, 358 P.3d 571 (Alaska 2015).
Tagaban v. City of Pelican, 358 P.3d 571 (Alaska 2015). · cites it 3× “And because Ta-gaban did not record the second lien extension until after the redemption period ended, we affirm the superior court's conclusion that the City was not required to issue redemption notice to him under AS 29.45.440 because he was not a lienholder of record when…”
Bingman v. City of Dillingham, 376 P.3d 1245 (Alaska 2016). “See AS 29.45.440(a) (providing for notice and preparations before the expiration of the redemption period); DMC 4.”
Lot 04B & 5C Block 83 Townsite v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 261 P.3d 422 (Alaska 2011). “AS 29.45.440 (notice) AS 29.45.450 (transfer).”
Tagaban v. City of Pelican (Alaska 2015). · cites it 3× “And because Tagaban did not record the second lien extension until after the redemption period ended, we affirm the superior court’s conclusion that the City was not required to issue redemption notice to him under AS 29.”
— Alaska Stat. § 29.45.440(a) — 3 cases
Bingman v. City of Dillingham, 376 P.3d 1245 (Alaska 2016). “See AS 29.45.440(a) (providing for notice and preparations before the expiration of the redemption period); DMC 4.”
Tagaban v. City of Pelican, 358 P.3d 571 (Alaska 2015). “And because Ta-gaban did not record the second lien extension until after the redemption period ended, we affirm the superior court's conclusion that the City was not required to issue redemption notice to him under AS 29.45.440 because he was not a lienholder of record when…”
Tagaban v. City of Pelican (Alaska 2015). “And because Tagaban did not record the second lien extension until after the redemption period ended, we affirm the superior court’s conclusion that the City was not required to issue redemption notice to him under AS 29.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.