Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 33.30.065 (2026)

Service of sentence by electronic monitoring

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 33.30.065. Service of sentence by electronic monitoring.
 (a) If the commissioner designates a prisoner to serve the prisoner's term of imprisonment or period of temporary commitment, or a part of the term or period, by electronic monitoring, the commissioner shall direct the prisoner to serve the term or period at the prisoner's residence or other place selected by the commissioner. The electronic monitoring shall be administered by the department or by a private contractor approved by the department under AS 33.30.011(a)(10)(B) and shall be designed so that any attempt to remove, tamper with, or disable the monitoring equipment or to leave the place selected for the service of the term or period will result in a report or notice to the department.

 (b) In determining whether to designate a prisoner to serve a term of imprisonment or period of temporary commitment by electronic monitoring, the commissioner shall consider
     (1) safeguards to the public;

     (2) the prospects for the prisoner's rehabilitation;

     (3) the availability of program and facility space;

     (4) the nature and circumstances of the offense for which the prisoner was sentenced or for which the prisoner is serving a period of temporary commitment;

     (5) the needs of the prisoner as determined by a classification committee and any recommendations made by the sentencing court;

     (6) the record of convictions of the prisoner, with particular emphasis on crimes specified in AS 11.41 or crimes involving domestic violence;

     (7) the use of drugs or alcohol by the prisoner; and

     (8) other criteria considered appropriate by the commissioner.

 (c) A decision by the commissioner to designate a prisoner to serve a term of imprisonment or a period of temporary confinement, or a part of the term or period, by electronic monitoring does not create a liberty interest in that status for the prisoner. The prisoner may be returned to a correctional facility at the discretion of the commissioner.

 (d) The commissioner may require a prisoner designated to serve a term of imprisonment or a period of temporary confinement by electronic monitoring to pay all or a portion of the costs of the electronic monitoring, but only if the prisoner has sufficient financial resources to pay the costs or a portion of the costs.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2022 · leading case: State of Alaska, Dep't of Corr. v. Trevor Stefano, 516 P.3d 486 (Alaska 2022).
State of Alaska, Dep't of Corr. v. Trevor Stefano, 516 P.3d 486 (Alaska 2022). · cites it 14× “) -17- 7616 AS 33.30.065, provides little detail about the content of the program or the procedures for administering it.”
Diaz v. State, Dep't of Corr., 239 P.3d 723 (Alaska 2010). · cites it 2× “2007) (citing AS 33.30.065) (referring to sentenced prisoners assigned to serve part of their terms of imprisonment in electronic monitoring as "already in the custody of the Department of Corrections").”
Matthew v. State, 152 P.3d 469 (Alaska Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “[20] AS 33.30.065. [21] AS 33.30.121. [22] Lock, 609 P.”
Ackerman v. State, 179 P.3d 951 (Alaska Ct. App. 2008). “061(c) and AS 33.30.065. These statutes authorize the Commissioner of Corrections to release prisoners from correctional facilities to serve their sentence at their residence (or at some other specified living place) under electronic monitoring.”
Bridge v. State, 258 P.3d 923 (Alaska Ct. App. 2011). “[11] For example, AS 33.30.065 authorizes the Department of Corrections to allow a prisoner to serve their term of imprisonment, or to serve their period of temporary commitment while awaiting trial, by living at home under electronic monitoring.”
Degrate v. State, 117 P.3d 769 (Alaska Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “Subsection (c) of this statute addresses the option of electronic monitoring as authorized by AS 33.30.065, but this subsection declares that the question of electronic monitoring is entrusted to the Commissioner’s discretion: “The commissioner may, under AS 33.”
— Alaska Stat. § 33.30.065(b) — 1 case
State of Alaska, Dep't of Corr. v. Trevor Stefano, 516 P.3d 486 (Alaska 2022). “) -17- 7616 AS 33.30.065, provides little detail about the content of the program or the procedures for administering it.”
— Alaska Stat. § 33.30.065(b)(2) — 1 case
State of Alaska, Dep't of Corr. v. Trevor Stefano, 516 P.3d 486 (Alaska 2022). “) -17- 7616 AS 33.30.065, provides little detail about the content of the program or the procedures for administering it.”
— Alaska Stat. § 33.30.065(c) — 2 cases
State of Alaska, Dep't of Corr. v. Trevor Stefano, 516 P.3d 486 (Alaska 2022). “) -17- 7616 AS 33.30.065, provides little detail about the content of the program or the procedures for administering it.”
Diaz v. State, Dep't of Corr., 239 P.3d 723 (Alaska 2010). “2007) (citing AS 33.30.065) (referring to sentenced prisoners assigned to serve part of their terms of imprisonment in electronic monitoring as "already in the custody of the Department of Corrections").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.