Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 39.52.370 (2026)

Personnel board action

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 39.52.370. Personnel board action.
 (a) Within 10 days after receipt of the hearing officer's report, either party may protest the officer's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation, and, if a protest is filed, shall serve a copy on the other party. Oral argument before the personnel board must be provided only if requested by either party. The board chair shall set the deadline for submission of requests for oral argument, and set the dates for submission of briefs and oral argument before the board, if requested.

 (b) The board may issue subpoenas under AS 39.52.380, and may, for good cause shown, augment the hearing record, in whole or in part, or hold a hearing de novo.

 (c) The personnel board shall review each report submitted by a hearing officer and shall either adopt or amend the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the officer. Deliberations of the personnel board must be conducted in sessions not open to the public.

 (d) If the personnel board determines that a violation occurred, it may impose the penalties in AS 39.52.410, 39.52.440, and 39.52.450, as appropriate. If the board determines that no violation occurred, the board shall issue a written order of dismissal.

 (e) The personnel board secretary shall promptly notify the parties and the public officer's designated supervisor of the board's action.

 (f) The subject of the accusation may appeal the personnel board's decision by filing an appeal in the superior court as provided in the Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure.




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2007 · leading case: Jurgens v. City of North Pole, 153 P.3d 321 (Alaska 2007).
Jurgens v. City of North Pole, 153 P.3d 321 (Alaska 2007). “AS 39.52.370, 410. Under the act, the preponderance of the evidence standard applies at the hearing.”
Skvorc v. State, Pers. Bd., 996 P.2d 1192 (Alaska 2000). · cites it 4× “360; AS 39.52.370. [3] Op. at 1198. [4] Op. at 1198-1199 (footnote omitted).”
Alaska Stat. § 39.52.370(c): 1 case
Skvorc v. State, Pers. Bd., 996 P.2d 1192 (Alaska 2000). “360; AS 39.52.370. [3] Op. at 1198. [4] Op. at 1198-1199 (footnote omitted).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.