Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 42.05.401 (2026)
Apportionment of joint rates
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 42.05.401. Apportionment of joint rates.
(a) If public utilities share in a joint rate the apportionment of receipts shall be just and reasonable. The method of apportionment shall be approved by the commission and the commission may, if it considers it to be in the public interest, establish the portion to which each public utility shall be entitled.
(b) If the commission does not have professional staff to investigate, evaluate, and testify regarding any proceeding under (a) of this section it may employ qualified professional consultants for this purpose at the direct expense of the parties to the dispute and divide the cost among the parties in the proportion of their respective operating revenues before commencement of the proceeding. The cost allocation to each party shall be determined before employment of the consultants and after giving the parties reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard.
(a) If public utilities share in a joint rate the apportionment of receipts shall be just and reasonable. The method of apportionment shall be approved by the commission and the commission may, if it considers it to be in the public interest, establish the portion to which each public utility shall be entitled.
(b) If the commission does not have professional staff to investigate, evaluate, and testify regarding any proceeding under (a) of this section it may employ qualified professional consultants for this purpose at the direct expense of the parties to the dispute and divide the cost among the parties in the proportion of their respective operating revenues before commencement of the proceeding. The cost allocation to each party shall be determined before employment of the consultants and after giving the parties reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1979–1979 · leading case: United States v. RCA Alaska Commc'ns, Inc., 597 P.2d 489 (Alaska 1979).
United States v. RCA Alaska Commc'ns, Inc., 597 P.2d 489 (Alaska 1979). “[18] This inference is strengthened somewhat by the agency's reliance upon AS 42.05.401(a) as one source of authority for 3 AAC 48.”
Alaska Stat. § 42.05.401(a): 1 case
United States v. RCA Alaska Commc'ns, Inc., 597 P.2d 489 (Alaska 1979). “[18] This inference is strengthened somewhat by the agency's reliance upon AS 42.05.401(a) as one source of authority for 3 AAC 48.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.