Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 42.06.370 (2026)
Rates to be just and reasonable
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 42.06.370. Rates to be just and reasonable.
(a) All rates demanded or received by a pipeline carrier, or by any two or more pipeline carriers jointly, for a service furnished or to be furnished shall be just and reasonable.
(b) Additional regulations governing determination of a reasonable tariff shall be published by the commission.
(c) Rates demanded, observed, charged, or collected by a North Slope natural gas pipeline carrier for intrastate service shall be designed as if that portion of the North Slope natural gas pipeline were a public utility regulated under the provisions of AS 42.05.
(a) All rates demanded or received by a pipeline carrier, or by any two or more pipeline carriers jointly, for a service furnished or to be furnished shall be just and reasonable.
(b) Additional regulations governing determination of a reasonable tariff shall be published by the commission.
(c) Rates demanded, observed, charged, or collected by a North Slope natural gas pipeline carrier for intrastate service shall be designed as if that portion of the North Slope natural gas pipeline were a public utility regulated under the provisions of AS 42.05.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Regulatory Comm'n, 176 P.3d 667 (Alaska 2008).
Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Regulatory Comm'n, 176 P.3d 667 (Alaska 2008). “The APUC opened Docket 97-4 to determine if post-1996 rates were just and reasonable under AS 42.06.370. The Carriers filed their ease-in-chief on October 8, 1998, focusing on whether TSM should continue to govern intrastate rates.”
Regulatory Com'n of Alaska v. Tesoro Alaska Co., 178 P.3d 1159 (Alaska 2008). “The Shippers point to mandatory language in AS 42.06.370(a), which states that “[a]ll rates demanded or received by a pipeline carrier, or by any two or more pipeline carriers jointly, .”
Alaska Stat. § 42.06.370(a): 2 cases
Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Regulatory Comm'n, 176 P.3d 667 (Alaska 2008). “The APUC opened Docket 97-4 to determine if post-1996 rates were just and reasonable under AS 42.06.370. The Carriers filed their ease-in-chief on October 8, 1998, focusing on whether TSM should continue to govern intrastate rates.”
Regulatory Com'n of Alaska v. Tesoro Alaska Co., 178 P.3d 1159 (Alaska 2008). “The Shippers point to mandatory language in AS 42.06.370(a), which states that “[a]ll rates demanded or received by a pipeline carrier, or by any two or more pipeline carriers jointly, .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.