Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 45.02.714 (2026)
Buyer's damages for breach in regard to accepted goods
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 45.02.714. Buyer's damages for breach in regard to accepted goods.
(a) If the buyer has accepted goods and given notification (AS 45.02.607(c)), the buyer may recover as damages for a nonconformity of tender the loss resulting in the ordinary course of events from the seller's breach as determined in a reasonable manner.
(b) The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, unless special circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount.
(c) In a proper case any incidental and consequential damages under AS 45.02.715 may also be recovered.
(a) If the buyer has accepted goods and given notification (AS 45.02.607(c)), the buyer may recover as damages for a nonconformity of tender the loss resulting in the ordinary course of events from the seller's breach as determined in a reasonable manner.
(b) The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, unless special circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount.
(c) In a proper case any incidental and consequential damages under AS 45.02.715 may also be recovered.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Haskell/Davis Jt. Venture v. TAKRAF USA, Inc. (D. Alaska 2022).
Haskell/Davis Jt. Venture v. TAKRAF USA, Inc. (D. Alaska 2022). “37 Common examples of consequential damages include lost profits, down or idle time, increased insurance costs, interest or finance charges, loss of use of goods, and increased overhead, labor, and equipment expenses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.