Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 46.14.240 (2026)
Permit administration fees
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 46.14.240. Permit administration fees.
(a) The owner or operator of a stationary source who is required to apply for a permit under AS 46.14.130 shall pay to the department all assessed permit administration fees established under (b) of this section except that the person named in a permit issued under AS 46.14.170 shall pay assessed permit administration fees incurred after the date the permit is issued.
(b) The department shall establish by regulation permit administration fees in accordance with AS 37.10.050 — 37.10.058.
(c) [Repealed, §§ 60(b), 65 ch 46 SLA 2003.]
(d) Costs incurred by the department and other state or local governmental agencies that are assessed against small business facilities that qualify for assistance under AS 46.14.300 — 46.14.310 shall be recovered from emission fees under AS 46.14.250(h)(2) for the following services:
(1) providing preapplication consultation, assistance, and completeness review of applications for a permit, an amendment, a permit modification, or a renewal of a permit;
(2) reviewing or assisting in the preparation of specific documents to support a permit for a stationary source; the documents described in this paragraph include on-site evaluations.
(a) The owner or operator of a stationary source who is required to apply for a permit under AS 46.14.130 shall pay to the department all assessed permit administration fees established under (b) of this section except that the person named in a permit issued under AS 46.14.170 shall pay assessed permit administration fees incurred after the date the permit is issued.
(b) The department shall establish by regulation permit administration fees in accordance with AS 37.10.050 — 37.10.058.
(c) [Repealed, §§ 60(b), 65 ch 46 SLA 2003.]
(d) Costs incurred by the department and other state or local governmental agencies that are assessed against small business facilities that qualify for assistance under AS 46.14.300 — 46.14.310 shall be recovered from emission fees under AS 46.14.250(h)(2) for the following services:
(1) providing preapplication consultation, assistance, and completeness review of applications for a permit, an amendment, a permit modification, or a renewal of a permit;
(2) reviewing or assisting in the preparation of specific documents to support a permit for a stationary source; the documents described in this paragraph include on-site evaluations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. State, Dep't of Env't Conservation, 145 P.3d 561 (Alaska 2006).
Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. State, Dep't of Env't Conservation, 145 P.3d 561 (Alaska 2006). “Because we interpret former AS 46.14.240 as allowing the fee assessment, and because Alyeska has failed to demonstrate that its due process rights were violated, we affirm the decision of the superi- or court that affirmed the ruling of the department's deputy commissioner.”
Alaska Stat. § 46.14.240(c): 1 case
Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. State, Dep't of Env't Conservation, 145 P.3d 561 (Alaska 2006). “Because we interpret former AS 46.14.240 as allowing the fee assessment, and because Alyeska has failed to demonstrate that its due process rights were violated, we affirm the decision of the superi- or court that affirmed the ruling of the department's deputy commissioner.”
Alaska Stat. § 46.14.240(c)(1): 1 case
Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. State, Dep't of Env't Conservation, 145 P.3d 561 (Alaska 2006). “Because we interpret former AS 46.14.240 as allowing the fee assessment, and because Alyeska has failed to demonstrate that its due process rights were violated, we affirm the decision of the superi- or court that affirmed the ruling of the department's deputy commissioner.”
Alaska Stat. § 46.14.240(c)(3): 1 case
Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. State, Dep't of Env't Conservation, 145 P.3d 561 (Alaska 2006). “Because we interpret former AS 46.14.240 as allowing the fee assessment, and because Alyeska has failed to demonstrate that its due process rights were violated, we affirm the decision of the superi- or court that affirmed the ruling of the department's deputy commissioner.”
Alaska Stat. § 46.14.240(c)(8): 1 case
Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co. v. State, Dep't of Env't Conservation, 145 P.3d 561 (Alaska 2006). “Because we interpret former AS 46.14.240 as allowing the fee assessment, and because Alyeska has failed to demonstrate that its due process rights were violated, we affirm the decision of the superi- or court that affirmed the ruling of the department's deputy commissioner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.