Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-593 (2026)

Reporting of certain deaths; failure to report; violation; classification

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Any person having knowledge of the occurrence of the death of a human being including a fetal death that is required to be reported pursuant to subsection B, of this section shall promptly notify the nearest peace officer of all information in the person's possession regarding the death and the circumstances surrounding it.

B. Reporting is required in the following circumstances:

1. Death when not under the current care of a health care provider as defined pursuant to section 36-301.

2. Death resulting from violence.

3. Unexpected or unexplained death.

4. Death of a person in a custodial agency as defined in section 13-4401.

5. Unexpected or unexplained death of an infant or child.

6. Death occurring in a suspicious, unusual or nonnatural manner, including death from an accident believed to be related to the deceased person's occupation or employment.

7. Death occurring as a result of anesthetic or surgical procedures.

8. Death suspected to be caused by a previously unreported or undiagnosed disease that constitutes a threat to public safety.

9. Death involving unidentifiable bodies.

C. The peace officer shall promptly notify the county medical examiner or alternate medical examiner and, except in deaths occurring as a result of surgical or anesthetic procedures, shall make or cause to be made an investigation of the facts and circumstances surrounding the death and report the results to the medical examiner or alternate medical examiner. If there is no county medical examiner or alternate medical examiner appointed and serving within the county, the county sheriff shall be notified by the peace officer and the sheriff shall in turn notify and secure a licensed physician having the qualifications of an alternate medical examiner to assume the powers and duties prescribed by section 11-594.

D. Every person who knows of the existence of a body where death occurred as specified in subsection A of this section and who knowingly fails to notify the nearest peace officer as soon as possible unless the person has good reason to believe that notice has already been given is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.

E. If the deceased was under treatment for an accident or illness by prayer or spiritual means alone, in accordance with the tenets and practices of a well-recognized church or religious denomination, and death occurred without a physician or nurse practitioner in attendance, the person who has knowledge of the death shall report all information in the person's possession regarding the death and circumstances surrounding it directly to the county medical examiner or the alternate medical examiner who may waive an external examination or autopsy if the county medical examiner or alternate medical examiner is satisfied that the death of the person resulted from natural causes.

F. Each county shall provide to the department of public safety fingerprints of all deceased persons for whom the circumstances of death require an external examination or autopsy and whose deaths are required to be investigated pursuant to this section.  These fingerprints shall be on a form provided by the department of public safety and shall be accompanied by any other information regarding the physical description and the date and place of death the department of public safety requires.  Fingerprints taken pursuant to this section shall be used only for the purpose of purging criminal history files. All information and data in the department of public safety that are furnished in compliance with this section are confidential and may be disclosed only on written approval of the director of the department of public safety to the juvenile court, social agencies and public health and law enforcement agencies licensed or regulated by this state.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2024 · leading case: Vasquez v. State, 206 P.3d 753 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vasquez v. State, 206 P.3d 753 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “[12] At oral argument in this court, Vasquez cited for the first time and without elaboration A.R.S. § 11-593(B). Any argument based on that statute, however, is waived.”
State v. Lockwood, 218 P.3d 1008 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “For example, A.R.S. § 11-593 makes it a misdemeanor to fail under certain circumstances to report “the existence of a body” resulting from “the death of a human being including a fetal death.”
Morton v. Maricopa Cnty., 865 P.2d 808 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. §§ 11-593(D), 41-1750(B), and 41-2411, et seq.”
Sohler v. Benjo (D. Ariz. 2021). · cites it 4× “Parker and A.R.S. § 11-593 13 Finally, Plaintiff appears to assert that Defendants committed fraud because they 14 lied or withheld information from Dr.”
Johnson v. Phoenix, City of (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 4× “8 Plaintiff alleges that she holds a “quasi-property right to the body of the Decedent” 9 and that Defendants “intentionally violated Plaintiff’s procedural due process rights by 10 failing to comply with the requirements outlined in A.R.S. § 11-593 and A.R.S. § 11- 11 597.01.”
State of Arizona v. Regina Marie Lockwood (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “Because the jury found Lockwood guilty as charged, it did not consider whether she was guilty of failing to report a death pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-593, which the trial court characterized as a lesser- included offense.”
Vasquez v. State of Az. St. of Az. Dept. of Pub. Saf. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “Vasquez does not explain how the alleged acts or omissions of the county sheriff’s office and DPS can somehow be characterized as “remov[ing], withhold[ing], 12 At oral argument in this court, Vasquez cited for the first time and without elaboration A.R.S. § 11-593(B). Any…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-593(B): 2 cases
Vasquez v. State, 206 P.3d 753 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). “[12] At oral argument in this court, Vasquez cited for the first time and without elaboration A.R.S. § 11-593(B). Any argument based on that statute, however, is waived.”
Vasquez v. State of Az. St. of Az. Dept. of Pub. Saf. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). “Vasquez does not explain how the alleged acts or omissions of the county sheriff’s office and DPS can somehow be characterized as “remov[ing], withhold[ing], 12 At oral argument in this court, Vasquez cited for the first time and without elaboration A.R.S. § 11-593(B). Any…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-593(C): 1 case
Johnson v. Phoenix, City of (D. Ariz. 2024). “8 Plaintiff alleges that she holds a “quasi-property right to the body of the Decedent” 9 and that Defendants “intentionally violated Plaintiff’s procedural due process rights by 10 failing to comply with the requirements outlined in A.R.S. § 11-593 and A.R.S. § 11- 11 597.01.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-593(D): 1 case
Morton v. Maricopa Cnty., 865 P.2d 808 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “A.R.S. §§ 11-593(D), 41-1750(B), and 41-2411, et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.