Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-120.23 (2026)
Transfer of case and appeal by the supreme court
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The supreme court may transfer to the court of appeals for decision a case or appeal pending before the supreme court if the case or appeal is within the jurisdiction of the court of appeals.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1965–1992 · leading case: Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Dir. of Ins., 422 P.2d 108 (Ariz. 1966).
Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Dir. of Ins., 422 P.2d 108 (Ariz. 1966). “Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be transferred to Division One of the Court of Appeals by authority of A.R.S. § 12-120.23, as it has been properly filed in, and heretofore pending in, this court.”
Bade v. Drachman, 417 P.2d 689 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966). “The matter was referred to this Court pursuant to Section 12-120.23 A.R.S. [1] At the conclusion of the hearing upon plaintiffs' petition for a temporary injunction, the court granted the temporary injunction on Count I and denied the temporary injunction on Count II so that…”
State v. Cobb, 406 P.2d 421 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). “The matter was referred to this Court pursuant to Section 12-120.23 A.R.S.”
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co., 405 P.2d 814 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). “The matter was referred to this Court pursuant to § 12-120.23 A.R.S. [1] The Act was authorized by the following amendment to the Arizona Constitution, Article 18 § 8: "The Legislature shall enact a Workmen's Compensation Law applicable to workmen engaged in manual or mechanical…”
Simpson v. Heiderich, 419 P.2d 362 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966). “Section 12-120.23. [1] The Supreme Court of Arizona stated: "The jury must be given an opportunity to evaluate the expert's conclusion by his testimony as to what matters he took into consideration to reach it.”
Eureka-Sec. Fire & Marine Insu. Co. v. Simon, 401 P.2d 759 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). “The matter was referred to this Court pursuant to Section 12-120.23 A.R.S.”
R & R REALTY CO. v. Weinstein, 422 P.2d 148 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966). “The matter was referred to this Court pursuant to Section 12-120.23 A.R.S. [1] The map and plat of Williams Addition has been reproduced as an Appendix to this opinion.”
Kammert Bros. Enter., Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co., 420 P.2d 592 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). “The matter was referred to this court pursuant to section 12-120.23 A.R.S. [1] For reasons unexplained in the record, there were placed in escrow a deed and assignment to the subject property from the buyer-corporation (plaintiff in this action) to Winter-Luety, Inc.”
Bergman v. Bergman, 401 P.2d 163 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). “The matter was referred to this Court pursuant to Section 12-120.23, A.R.S. [1] The rules governing this case are the rules as they were in effect prior to the extensive amendments which were effective 31 October, 1961.”
State v. Porter, 609 P.2d 1055 (Ariz. 1980). “Jurisdiction is established by A.R.S. § 12-120.23 and by 17A, A.R.S., Rules of Supreme Court, Rule 47(b).”
In Re Adoption of Luke, 414 P.2d 176 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1966). “Section 12-120.23. [1] A.R.S. § 8-110 provides: "A petitioner, parent, guardian or other person having an interest in the adoption of a child, may appeal to the supreme court from the granting or refusal of either the interlocutory or final order of adoption as in other appeals,…”
Bd. of Educ., Tucson Hs Dist. No. 1 v. Williams, 403 P.2d 324 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1965). “The matter was referred to this court pursuant to § 12-120.23, A.R.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.