A. In redeeming property the judgment debtor shall pay the amount of the purchase price with eight per cent added thereto, together with the amount of any assessments or taxes which the purchaser has lawfully paid thereon after purchase, and interest on such amount.
B. Each subsequent redemptioner shall pay the aggregate of such amounts plus the amount of the lien thereon of the ones who may have redeemed the property theretofore. If the purchaser is also a creditor having a prior lien to that of the redemptioner, other than the judgment lien, the redemptioner shall pay, in addition, the amount of such creditor's lien with interest. The payments may be made to the officer who made the sale.
Notes of Decisions
Kries v. Allen Carpet, Inc., 706 P.2d 360 (Ariz. 1985).
· cites it 4× “See Historical Note following A.R.S. § 12-1285. She asserts that Simpson is persuasive authority because it is a California case construing that state’s statutes.”
Helvetica Servicing, Inc. v. Giraudo, 389 P.3d 867 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 8× “) And finally, A.R.S. § 12-1285 provides the overall structure of the redemption price calculation: A.”
Byers v. Wik, 818 P.2d 200 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “Based on equitable principles, as a condition of the entry of a decree in favor of the Trust quieting title to the property, the Trust shall pay to the Wiks, within six months from the date of the mandate in this case, the redemption amount calculated pursuant to A.R.S. §…”
United States v. Aldrich, 795 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1986).
· cites it 2× “Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 12-1285. Here, the senior lienholders paid $130,-962.”
S & M Trust Co. v. Valley Lumber Co., 427 P.2d 354 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967).
“, and each subsequent creditor having a lien in succession, according to priority of liens, within five days after the time allowed the prior lienholder, respectively, may redeem by paying the amount for which the property was sold and all liens prior to his own held by the…”
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Arizona HOA Acceptance LLC, 369 P.3d 259 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “These different formulations have been part of our redemption statutes from their inception. Compare § 2576 of the 1901 Territorial Civil Code (“1901 Code”) (property may be redeemed by “creditor having a lien by judgment or mortgage on the property sold”); § 2577 (if judgment…”
Nieblas v. Bonitas Casitas (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
· cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 12-1285(A); 12-1282(B). ¶5 On December 29, 2019, MCSO contacted Bonitas to ask for the amount of expenses it incurred for purposes of redemption.”
Wood v. Wilson, 481 P.2d 294 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 2× “We do not reach any of these questions because before appellant' was entitled to an accounting for rents and profits, it was incumbent upon her to tender to the purchaser the purchase price-plus 8% and any assessment or taxes purchaser has paid plus interest as required by A.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1285(A): 2 cases
Kries v. Allen Carpet, Inc., 706 P.2d 360 (Ariz. 1985).
“See Historical Note following A.R.S. § 12-1285. She asserts that Simpson is persuasive authority because it is a California case construing that state’s statutes.”
Nieblas v. Bonitas Casitas (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
“See A.R.S. §§ 12-1285(A); 12-1282(B). ¶5 On December 29, 2019, MCSO contacted Bonitas to ask for the amount of expenses it incurred for purposes of redemption.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1285(B): 2 cases
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Arizona HOA Acceptance LLC, 369 P.3d 259 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“These different formulations have been part of our redemption statutes from their inception. Compare § 2576 of the 1901 Territorial Civil Code (“1901 Code”) (property may be redeemed by “creditor having a lien by judgment or mortgage on the property sold”); § 2577 (if judgment…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.