Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101 (2026)

Judgments and orders that may be appealed

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals from the superior court in the following instances:

1. From a final judgment entered in an action or special proceeding commenced in a superior court, or brought into a superior court from any other court, except in actions of forcible entry and detainer when the annual rental value of the property is less than $300.

2. From any special order made after final judgment.

3. From any order affecting a substantial right made in any action when the order in effect determines the action and prevents judgment from which an appeal might be taken.

4. From a final order affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding or on a summary application in an action after judgment.

5. From an order:

(a) Granting or refusing a new trial or granting a motion in arrest of judgment.

(b) Granting or dissolving an injunction or refusing to grant or dissolve an injunction or appointing a receiver.

(d) Granting or denying a petition to restore a person's right to possess a firearm pursuant to section 13-925.

(e) Granting or denying a motion to dismiss or quash pursuant to section 12-751, unless the court did not find that the moving party established prima facie proof as prescribed in section 12-751, subsection B. The court of appeals shall expedite any appeal filed pursuant to this subdivision unless the court for good cause finds that expedited review is not feasible under the circumstances or a court rule specifically provides otherwise.

6. From an interlocutory judgment that determines the rights of the parties and directs an accounting or other proceeding to determine the amount of the recovery.

7. From an interlocutory judgment in any action for partition that determines the rights and interests of the respective parties and directs partition to be made.

8. From any interlocutory judgment, decree or order made or entered in actions to redeem real or personal property from a mortgage thereof or lien thereon, determining such right to redeem and directing an accounting.

9. From a judgment, decree or order entered in any formal proceedings under title 14.

10. From an order or judgment:

(a) Adjudging a person insane or incompetent or committing a person to the state hospital.

(b) Revoking or refusing to revoke an order or judgment adjudging a person insane or incompetent or restoring or refusing to restore to competency any person who has been declared insane or incompetent.

11. From an order or judgment made and entered on habeas corpus proceedings:

(a) The petitioner may appeal from an order or judgment refusing the petitioner's discharge.

(b) The officer having the custody of the petitioner, or the county attorney on behalf of the state, from an order or judgment discharging the petitioner whereupon the court may admit the petitioner to bail pending the appeal.

B. If any order or judgment referred to in this section is made or rendered by a judge it is appealable as if made by the court.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2,623 cases (836 in the last 5 years), 1958–2026 · leading case: Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC, 380 P.3d 659 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC, 380 P.3d 659 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 128× “A judgment may be identified as a ‘judgment,’ or it may be identified as an ‘order,’ a ‘decree,’ or by another term.”). Accordingly, the finality requirement of Rules 54(b) and 54(c) could be read to apply broadly to all appealable orders.”

Bilke v. State, 80 P.3d 269 (Ariz. 2003). · cites it 71× “Second, Cook also observed that “A.R.S. § 12-2101 separately provides for interlocutory appeal in other selected types of traditionally equitable remedies.”

Yee v. Yee, 484 P.3d 650 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 32× “¶9 A.R.S. § 12-2101, titled “Judgments and orders that may be appealed,” specifies many types of orders over which this court has appellate jurisdiction.”

Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc., 211 P.3d 16 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 36× “The question we address is whether the court's sanctions order is appealable under the statute governing our appellate jurisdiction, A.R.S. § 12-2101. ¶ 12 In concluding we have jurisdiction to address this appeal, we begin with two principles: one found in § 12-2101 and the…”

Garza v. Swift Transp. Co., 213 P.3d 1008 (Ariz. 2009). · cites it 28× “In general, “the types of judgments and orders from which appeals may be taken are set forth in A.R.S. § 12-2101.” Id. “With certain exceptions .”

S. California Edison Co. v. Peabody W. Coal Co., 977 P.2d 769 (Ariz. 1999). · cites it 22× “Under A.R.S. § 12-2101, the general statute governing appeals, the finality of an order compelling arbitration is not dependent on whether the order was entered in an embedded or independent proceeding.”

Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C., 161 P.3d 1253 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 12× “Following oral argument, the trial court granted Desert Life’s motion and directed the parties to “arbitrate all claims in *593 accordance with the terms of the arbitration agreement.”

Mezey v. Fioramonti, 65 P.3d 980 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 31× “In any event, the blurring of forms of action at law and equity does not justify expanding a statute which mentions only a single, highly specialized proceeding to include all civil damage actions. ¶ 18 Expanding the statute to encompass the routine civil ease would undercut the…”

Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D., 636 P.2d 89 (Ariz. 1981). · cites it 18× “*313 A.R.S. § 12-2101 insofar as it is pertinent to the question of jurisdiction provides when an appeal may be taken.”

Santa Maria v. Najera, 214 P.3d 394 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 23× “2d 155, 156 (1960) (“The right [to appeal] is both defined and limited by A.R.S. § 12-2101. If the order in question does not come within the judgment and orders listed therein as those from which an appeal can be taken, this appeal must be dismissed.”

Moreno v. Beltran, 480 P.3d 647 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 22× “As relevant here, A.R.S. § 12-2101 lists the types of orders that are within this court's appellate jurisdiction.”

Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Ctr., Inc., 382 P.3d 812 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 9× “3d at 539 (applying § 12-2101 prior to renumbering), But as we have said, here, the court ultimately granted summary judgment, thus the dismissal order clearly did not “prevent[ a] judgment from which an appeal might be taken” so § 12-2101(A)(3) does not apply.”

Show all 2,623 citing cases →

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(0) — 10 cases

Marriage of Boncoskey v. Boncoskey, 167 P.3d 705 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).

Reid v. Reid, 213 P.3d 353 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).

Downs v. Scheffler, 80 P.3d 775 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).

Williams v. Williams, 264 P.3d 870 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).

Hilgeman v. Am. Mortg. Sec., Inc., 994 P.2d 1030 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(1) — 1 case

Taylor v. Aps (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(2) — 1 case

Discover Bank v. Plascencia (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(5)(b) — 1 case

Heritage v. Weinberg (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A) — 96 cases

Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC, 380 P.3d 659 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “A judgment may be identified as a ‘judgment,’ or it may be identified as an ‘order,’ a ‘decree,’ or by another term.”). Accordingly, the finality requirement of Rules 54(b) and 54(c) could be read to apply broadly to all appealable orders.”

Earle Investments, LLC v. S. Desert Med. Ctr. Partners, 394 P.3d 1089 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 336 P.3d 763 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

In Re Stephanie B., 65 P.3d 114 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).

Peterson v. Surprise, 418 P.3d 1020 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(1) — 1209 cases

Yee v. Yee, 484 P.3d 650 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). “¶9 A.R.S. § 12-2101, titled “Judgments and orders that may be appealed,” specifies many types of orders over which this court has appellate jurisdiction.”

Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Ctr., Inc., 382 P.3d 812 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “3d at 539 (applying § 12-2101 prior to renumbering), But as we have said, here, the court ultimately granted summary judgment, thus the dismissal order clearly did not “prevent[ a] judgment from which an appeal might be taken” so § 12-2101(A)(3) does not apply.”

Bobrow v. Bobrow, 391 P.3d 646 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

Deluna v. Petitto, 450 P.3d 1273 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(1)(2013) — 1 case

City of Phoenix v. Garretson, 302 P.3d 640 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(1)(2015) — 1 case

Phoenix Cement v. Yavapai (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(1)(2019) — 1 case

Sunflower v. Ahcccs (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(10) — 9 cases

State v. Zarco (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

In Re: Thomas C. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

In Re Ms2015-000003 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

In Re:mh 2021-008085 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(10)(a) — 4 cases

In Re: Patricia E. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

In Re Mh2018-004459 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).

In Re: Dakota D. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Mh2013-002179 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(11) — 1 case

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(11)(a) — 2 cases

State v. Zarco (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

Charlson v. State (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(2) — 231 cases

Hammett v. Hammett, 453 P.3d 1145 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).

Olesen v. daniel/burge, 484 P.3d 139 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).

John Munic Enter., Inc. v. Laos, 326 P.3d 279 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(2)(a) — 1 case

Marinello v. Glover (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(3) — 37 cases

Dunn v. Fastmed Urgent Care PC, 424 P.3d 436 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).

Romero v. Hasan, 388 P.3d 22 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

Moreno v. Beltran, 480 P.3d 647 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). “As relevant here, A.R.S. § 12-2101 lists the types of orders that are within this court's appellate jurisdiction.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(4) — 8 cases

AEA Fed. Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc., 346 P.3d 991 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

McA Fin. Grp., Ltd. v. Enter. Bank & Trust, 341 P.3d 1161 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

Lozano v. Pacco (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).

State v. Zarco (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(4)(d) — 1 case

Pinal Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors v. Georgini & T.J., 334 P.3d 761 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(5) — 5 cases

Marriage of Clark v. Clark, 370 P.3d 1119 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

In re the Marriage of Friedman, 397 P.3d 1063 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

Clark v. Clark (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

Sec. v. Reyelts (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

Origami v. Connelly (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(5)(a) — 30 cases

State of Arizona v. Austin Garrett Hansen, 345 P.3d 116 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Mgmt., Inc., 322 P.3d 168 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).

Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson, 390 P.3d 1226 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).

Long v. Olen, 276 P.3d 527 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(5)(b) — 60 cases

Moreno v. Beltran, 480 P.3d 647 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). “As relevant here, A.R.S. § 12-2101 lists the types of orders that are within this court's appellate jurisdiction.”

AEA Fed. Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc., 346 P.3d 991 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

TP Racing, L.L.L.P. v. Simms, 307 P.3d 56 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).

White Mountain Health Ctr., Inc. v. Maricopa Cnty., 386 P.3d 416 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(5)(c) — 6 cases

McDaniel v. Banes, 471 P.3d 1032 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020).

Baseline Tree v. Sun Valley (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).

Lattin v. Shamrock (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).

Cortez Inv. v. Yousif (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(5)(d) — 4 cases

State v. Petramala (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

In Re: Mh 2022-006131 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025).

State v. James (Ariz. Ct. App. 2024).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(6) — 9 cases

Fields v. Oates, 286 P.3d 160 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).

Catalina Foothills Unified Sch. Dist. No. 16 v. La Paloma Prop. Owners Ass'n, 278 P.3d 303 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).

Az Elec. Power v. Djl 2007, 443 P.3d 24 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).

Saban v. Ador, 418 P.3d 1066 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2018).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(6)(b) — 1 case

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(7) — 4 cases

State v. Zarco (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

Hackett v. Hackett (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

Nunez v. Valente (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(8) — 1 case

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(A)(9) — 30 cases

In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship Of: Robert Sommer, 386 P.3d 1281 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).

Est. of Lewis v. Lewis, 275 P.3d 615 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).

In Re Est. of King, 269 P.3d 1189 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).

Gardner v. Richardson, 283 P.3d 676 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(B) — 526 cases

Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc., 211 P.3d 16 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “The question we address is whether the court's sanctions order is appealable under the statute governing our appellate jurisdiction, A.R.S. § 12-2101. ¶ 12 In concluding we have jurisdiction to address this appeal, we begin with two principles: one found in § 12-2101 and the…”

S. California Edison Co. v. Peabody W. Coal Co., 977 P.2d 769 (Ariz. 1999). “Under A.R.S. § 12-2101, the general statute governing appeals, the finality of an order compelling arbitration is not dependent on whether the order was entered in an embedded or independent proceeding.”

Bilke v. State, 80 P.3d 269 (Ariz. 2003). “Second, Cook also observed that “A.R.S. § 12-2101 separately provides for interlocutory appeal in other selected types of traditionally equitable remedies.”

Solimeno v. Yonan, 227 P.3d 481 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).

In Re Est. of Newman, 196 P.3d 863 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(B)(1994) — 10 cases

Murcott v. Best W. Int'l, Inc., 9 P.3d 1088 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).

Airport Props. v. Maricopa Cnty., 985 P.2d 574 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).

TWE Ret. Fund Trust v. Ream, 8 P.3d 1182 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).

Arizona's Towing Professionals, Inc. v. State, 993 P.2d 1037 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).

PNL Asset Mgmt. Co. v. Brenden & Taylor P'ship, 970 P.2d 958 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(B)(2003) — 10 cases

Merlina v. Jejna, 90 P.3d 202 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).

Maleki v. Desert Palms Prof'l Props., L.L.C., 214 P.3d 415 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).

Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass'n v. Orlandini, 257 P.3d 1168 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).

Brookover v. Roberts Enter. Inc., 156 P.3d 1157 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).

Pargman v. Vickers, 96 P.3d 571 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2004).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(C) — 38 cases

Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc., 189 P.3d 1114 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).

Williams v. Williams, 264 P.3d 870 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).

Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C., 161 P.3d 1253 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “Following oral argument, the trial court granted Desert Life’s motion and directed the parties to “arbitrate all claims in *593 accordance with the terms of the arbitration agreement.”

Mezey v. Fioramonti, 65 P.3d 980 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). “In any event, the blurring of forms of action at law and equity does not justify expanding a statute which mentions only a single, highly specialized proceeding to include all civil damage actions. ¶ 18 Expanding the statute to encompass the routine civil ease would undercut the…”

Santa Maria v. Najera, 214 P.3d 394 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “2d 155, 156 (1960) (“The right [to appeal] is both defined and limited by A.R.S. § 12-2101. If the order in question does not come within the judgment and orders listed therein as those from which an appeal can be taken, this appeal must be dismissed.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(C)(2) — 1 case

Torres v. Furlong (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(D) — 31 cases

Garza v. Swift Transp. Co., 213 P.3d 1008 (Ariz. 2009). “In general, “the types of judgments and orders from which appeals may be taken are set forth in A.R.S. § 12-2101.” Id. “With certain exceptions .”

Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D., 636 P.2d 89 (Ariz. 1981). “*313 A.R.S. § 12-2101 insofar as it is pertinent to the question of jurisdiction provides when an appeal may be taken.”

Short v. Dewald, 244 P.3d 92 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).

Dusold v. Porta-John Corp., 807 P.2d 526 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(D)(1994) — 1 case

ESI Ergonomic Solutions, LLC v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., 50 P.3d 844 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(E) — 8 cases

Strait v. Strait, 224 P.3d 997 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).

Performance Funding, LLC v. Barcon Corp., 3 P.3d 1206 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).

Reed v. Reed, 740 P.2d 963 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).

Cook v. Cook, 547 P.2d 15 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1976).

Burnette v. Bender, 908 P.2d 1086 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(E)(1) — 1 case

In re MH 2007-000629, 197 P.3d 750 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(F) — 10 cases

Nu-Tred Tire Co. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp., 577 P.2d 268 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978).

Engineers v. Sharpe, 573 P.2d 487 (Ariz. 1977).

State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich, 726 P.2d 215 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(F)(1) — 20 cases

Davis v. Davis, 985 P.2d 643 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).

Craig v. Craig, 253 P.3d 624 (Ariz. 2011).

In Re Prop. Located at 6757 S. Burcham Ave., 64 P.3d 843 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).

Hall Fam. Props., Ltd. v. Gosnell Dev. Corp., 916 P.2d 1098 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(F)(1)(1994) — 1 case

Hall Fam. Props., Ltd. v. Gosnell Dev. Corp., 916 P.2d 1098 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1995).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(F)(2) — 21 cases

Dowling v. Stapley, 211 P.3d 1235 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).

LaFaro v. Cahill, 56 P.3d 56 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).

AEA Fed. Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc., 346 P.3d 991 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(F)(2)(1994) — 1 case

LaFaro v. Cahill, 56 P.3d 56 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(F)(3) — 5 cases

Schilling v. Embree, 575 P.2d 1262 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977).

Rackmaster Sys., Inc. v. Maderia, 193 P.3d 314 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).

Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Greene, 985 P.2d 590 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1999).

Klebba v. Carpenter, 139 P.3d 609 (Ariz. 2006).

Jones v. Weston, 212 P.3d 835 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(G) — 15 cases

Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D., 636 P.2d 89 (Ariz. 1981). “*313 A.R.S. § 12-2101 insofar as it is pertinent to the question of jurisdiction provides when an appeal may be taken.”

Pepsi-Cola Metro. Bottling Co. v. Romley, 578 P.2d 994 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(H) — 3 cases

Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. P'ship, 165 P.3d 674 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).

Cook v. Cook, 547 P.2d 15 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1976).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(J) — 26 cases

In Re Est. of Mcgathy, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010).

Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010).

Matter of Est. of Kerr, 667 P.2d 1351 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).

Williams v. Williams, 264 P.3d 870 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).

Dometri Investments, LLC v. Lind, 177 P.3d 305 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(J)(2003) — 1 case

In Re Est. of Wyttenbach, 193 P.3d 814 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(K)(1) — 3 cases

In Re Leon G., 18 P.3d 169 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001).

In re MH 2008-000097, 210 P.3d 1244 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).

In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx, 197 P.3d 750 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(K)(2) — 1 case

In Re the Commitment of Robert Flemming, 131 P.3d 478 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(L) — 1 case

McDonald v. Thomas, 12 P.3d 1194 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(L)(1) — 1 case

McDonald v. Thomas, 40 P.3d 819 (Ariz. 2002).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(a)(1) — 1 case

Bondurant v. Yelle (Ariz. Ct. App. 2025).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(a)(2) — 1 case

State v. McEvoy (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019).

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2101(b) — 1 case

Boydston v. Strole Dev. Co., 962 P.2d 209 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.