Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-223 (2026)

Attendance at and report of proceedings; sale of transcripts

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The court reporter shall attend court during the hearing of all matters before it unless excused by the judge. He shall make stenographic notes of all oral proceedings before the court, but unless requested by court or counsel, he need not make stenographic notes of arguments of counsel to a jury, nor of argument of counsel to the court in the absence of a jury.

B. Upon payment or tender of the fees therefor, he shall furnish to any person a typewritten transcript of all or any part of the proceedings reported by him, and upon request, certify that such transcript is a correct and complete statement of such proceedings.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1967–2019 · leading case: In Re Marriage of Reeder v. Johnson, 238 P.3d 123 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Marriage of Reeder v. Johnson, 238 P.3d 123 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-223(A) (2003); see Ariz. R. Fam.”

In Re the Appeal in Maricopa Cnty., Juv. Action No. J-74449A, 511 P.2d 693 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 4× “Inasmuch as no reporter was present at the dependency hearing, no transcript can be made available to aid this court in determining this question.”

Counterman v. Counterman, 433 P.2d 307 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-223, subsec. A states: “The court reporter shall attend court during the hearing of all matters before it unless excused by the judge.”

Burnett v. Walter, 660 P.2d 1234 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “*309 Does the right of an appeal give one the right to have a court reporter present, taking stenographic notes of the proceedings? The answer is obviously in the affirmative and A.R.S. § 12-223(A) which states that the court reporter shall be present “.”

State v. Bernal (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “Labeling the judge a commissioner does not violate A.R.S. § 12-223(B) (requiring the court reporter, upon request, to “certify that [the] transcript is a correct and complete statement of [the] proceedings”) and does not create any arguable issue of law.”

State v. Curry, 511 P.2d 625 (Ariz. 1973). · cites it 2× “In A.R.S. § 12-223, the Legislature prescribed the official duties of court reporters.”

In Re Marriage of Reeder v. Johnson, 227 P.3d 492 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-223(A) (2003); see Ariz. R. Fam.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-223(A) — 3 cases

In Re Marriage of Reeder v. Johnson, 238 P.3d 123 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). “A.R.S. § 12-223(A) (2003); see Ariz. R. Fam.”

Burnett v. Walter, 660 P.2d 1234 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982). “*309 Does the right of an appeal give one the right to have a court reporter present, taking stenographic notes of the proceedings? The answer is obviously in the affirmative and A.R.S. § 12-223(A) which states that the court reporter shall be present “.”

In Re Marriage of Reeder v. Johnson, 227 P.3d 492 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). “A.R.S. § 12-223(A) (2003); see Ariz. R. Fam.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-223(B) — 1 case

State v. Bernal (Ariz. Ct. App. 2019). “Labeling the judge a commissioner does not violate A.R.S. § 12-223(B) (requiring the court reporter, upon request, to “certify that [the] transcript is a correct and complete statement of [the] proceedings”) and does not create any arguable issue of law.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.