Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-622 (2026)

Notice of hearing; effect of establishing identity

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Upon filing the application provided for in section 12-621, if the court deems it proper that notice be given of the hearing on the application, it may order that notice be given by publication or by service upon the parties interested.

B. The identity, birthright and parentage, or both, when established, if different than the party was reputed to have, shall not operate to relieve him from any obligation incurred or assumed under the former identity.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1998 · leading case: Hurt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz., 601 P.2d 1329 (Ariz. 1979).
Hurt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz., 601 P.2d 1329 (Ariz. 1979). · cites it 2× “” This proceeding for establishing identity is usually an ex parte proceeding, although A.R.S. § 12-622(A) provides for notice to other “parties interested” if the court deems it proper.”
In Re the Marriage of Worcester, 960 P.2d 624 (Ariz. 1998). “§ 12-622(B). Here, the request to eliminate Donald as K.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-622(A): 1 case
Hurt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz., 601 P.2d 1329 (Ariz. 1979). “” This proceeding for establishing identity is usually an ex parte proceeding, although A.R.S. § 12-622(A) provides for notice to other “parties interested” if the court deems it proper.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-622(B): 1 case
In Re the Marriage of Worcester, 960 P.2d 624 (Ariz. 1998). “§ 12-622(B). Here, the request to eliminate Donald as K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.