Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 13
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2313 (2026)

Judicial powers over racketeering criminal cases

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

During the pendency of any criminal case charging an offense included in the definition of racketeering in section 13-2301, subsection D, paragraph 4 or a violation of section 13-2312, the superior court may, in addition to its other powers, issue an order pursuant to section 13-2314, subsections B and C. Upon conviction of a person for an offense included in the definition of racketeering in section 13-2301, subsection D, paragraph 4 or a violation of section 13-2312, the superior court may, in addition to its other powers of disposition, issue an order pursuant to section 13-2314.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–1992 · leading case: Rhue v. Dawson, 841 P.2d 215 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rhue v. Dawson, 841 P.2d 215 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 4× “Admittedly the latest amendment seeking to clarify A.R.S. § 13-2313(N) states that civil damages for racketeering are "not punitive" nor are they "exclusive.”
State v. Feld, 745 P.2d 146 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 13-2313 provides that during the pendency of a RICO criminal proceeding pursuant to § 13-2312 the superior court may issue an order pursuant to § 13-2314(B), (C) which provides: B.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-2313(N): 1 case
Rhue v. Dawson, 841 P.2d 215 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “Admittedly the latest amendment seeking to clarify A.R.S. § 13-2313(N) states that civil damages for racketeering are "not punitive" nor are they "exclusive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.