Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3823 (2026)

Access to records

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except for use by law enforcement officers and for dissemination as provided in section 41-1750, a statement, photograph or fingerprint required by this article shall not be made available to any person.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: State v. Noble, 829 P.2d 1217 (Ariz. 1992).
State v. Noble, 829 P.2d 1217 (Ariz. 1992). · cites it 2× “2d at 328 ; see A.R.S. §§ 13-3823 (access to records), 41-1750(B) (same).”
State v. Manning, 532 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “Stat. § 243.166, subd. 7. Similar sex offender registration statutes have been upheld in states where access to registration information is less restrictive than in Minnesota.”
In Re Appeal in Maricopa Cnty. Juv. Action No. JV-132744, 933 P.2d 1248 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. §§ 13-3823 (1989) and 41-1750 (Supp.”
State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena Trujillo, 462 P.3d 550 (Ariz. 2020). “The registry contains the offender’s name, address, age, current photograph, offense committed, risk assessment/notification level, and a copy of the offender’s nonoperating identification license or driver’s license.”
State v. Noble, 808 P.2d 325 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “They also include employers, potential employers, and volunteer youth-serving agencies if the victim of the underlying sexual offense was a minor and the registrant’s employment or volunteer activity would place him in regular contact with minors under fifteen years of age.”
Doe v. Mayes (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 4× “required by this article shall not be made available to any person.”); see 6 also A.R.S. § 41-1750 (listing instances where information can be disclosed).”
Doe (D. Ariz. 2026). · cites it 3× “§ 13-3825(C)(1); see also A.R.S. § 13-3823 (prohibiting 3 disclosure of registration statements “[e]xcept for use by law enforcement officers and for 4 dissemination as provided in § 41-1750”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.