Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3823 (2026)
Access to records
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except for use by law enforcement officers and for dissemination as provided in section 41-1750, a statement, photograph or fingerprint required by this article shall not be made available to any person.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: State v. Noble, 829 P.2d 1217 (Ariz. 1992).
State v. Noble, 829 P.2d 1217 (Ariz. 1992). “2d at 328 ; see A.R.S. §§ 13-3823 (access to records), 41-1750(B) (same).”
State v. Manning, 532 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “Stat. § 243.166, subd. 7. Similar sex offender registration statutes have been upheld in states where access to registration information is less restrictive than in Minnesota.”
In Re Appeal in Maricopa Cnty. Juv. Action No. JV-132744, 933 P.2d 1248 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “A.R.S. §§ 13-3823 (1989) and 41-1750 (Supp.”
State of Arizona v. Oscar Pena Trujillo, 462 P.3d 550 (Ariz. 2020). “The registry contains the offender’s name, address, age, current photograph, offense committed, risk assessment/notification level, and a copy of the offender’s nonoperating identification license or driver’s license.”
State v. Noble, 808 P.2d 325 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). “They also include employers, potential employers, and volunteer youth-serving agencies if the victim of the underlying sexual offense was a minor and the registrant’s employment or volunteer activity would place him in regular contact with minors under fifteen years of age.”
Doe v. Mayes (D. Ariz. 2025). “required by this article shall not be made available to any person.”); see 6 also A.R.S. § 41-1750 (listing instances where information can be disclosed).”
Doe (D. Ariz. 2026). “§ 13-3825(C)(1); see also A.R.S. § 13-3823 (prohibiting 3 disclosure of registration statements “[e]xcept for use by law enforcement officers and for 4 dissemination as provided in § 41-1750”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.