Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-1403 (2026)

Pleadings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In formal proceedings involving trusts or estates of decedents, minors, protected persons or incapacitated persons, interests to be affected must be described in pleadings that give reasonable information to owners by name or class, by reference to the instrument creating the interests or in some other appropriate manner.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1975–1989 · leading case: Rasmussen by Mitchell v. Fleming, 741 P.2d 674 (Ariz. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rasmussen by Mitchell v. Fleming, 741 P.2d 674 (Ariz. 1987). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 14-1403(4). In representing the *223 interests of his ward, the guardian ad litem will perform both procedural and substantive duties.”
Stewart v. Superior Court, 787 P.2d 126 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “, A.R.S. § 14-1403(4) (probate) and Rule 17(g), 16 A.”
Ray v. Superior Court, 540 P.2d 771 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 4× “Ray is a person who is unable to manage his property and affairs effectively in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the Veterans Administration, and, further, pursuant to A.R.S. § 14-1403(4) the court has determined that representation of John E.”
Est. of Ray v. Superior Court, 560 P.2d 1255 (Ariz. 1976). · cites it 4× “This court stated in Matter of the Estate of Ray, supra: “The very language of the statute [A.R.S. § 14-1403(4)], however, belies its interpretation as requiring the appointment of a guardian ad litem in all cases.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-1403(4): 4 cases
Rasmussen by Mitchell v. Fleming, 741 P.2d 674 (Ariz. 1987). “A.R.S. § 14-1403(4). In representing the *223 interests of his ward, the guardian ad litem will perform both procedural and substantive duties.”
Stewart v. Superior Court, 787 P.2d 126 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). “, A.R.S. § 14-1403(4) (probate) and Rule 17(g), 16 A.”
Ray v. Superior Court, 540 P.2d 771 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). “Ray is a person who is unable to manage his property and affairs effectively in accordance with the laws and regulations governing the Veterans Administration, and, further, pursuant to A.R.S. § 14-1403(4) the court has determined that representation of John E.”
Est. of Ray v. Superior Court, 560 P.2d 1255 (Ariz. 1976). “This court stated in Matter of the Estate of Ray, supra: “The very language of the statute [A.R.S. § 14-1403(4)], however, belies its interpretation as requiring the appointment of a guardian ad litem in all cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.