Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-3504 (2026)

Supervised administration; powers of personal representative

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless restricted by the court, a supervised personal representative has, without interim orders approving exercise of a power, all powers of personal representatives under this title, but all sales of real property shall be subject to court confirmation and the personal representative shall not exercise his power to make any distribution of the estate without prior order of the court. Any other restriction on the power of a personal representative which may be ordered by the court must be endorsed on his letters of appointment and, unless so endorsed, is ineffective as to persons dealing in good faith with the personal representative.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1977–2010 · leading case: Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marianne Waldow v. James Laporta, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 14-3504. ¶ 6 The UPC also offers the option of an unsupervised administration.”
Marmis v. Solot Co., 573 P.2d 899 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, since the real estate was being sold subject to court confirmation, A.R.S. § 14-3504 and § 14-3506(A), they knew any confirmation hearing could well develop into a bidding on the property by others.”
In Re Est. of Mcgathy, 246 P.3d 628 (Ariz. 2010). · cites it 2× “" A.R.S. § 14-3504. ¶ 6 The UPC also offers the option of an unsupervised administration.”
Cowley v. Kaechelle, 696 P.2d 1354 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 14× “[A]ny proceedings relating to estates of decedents then pending shall become proceedings in supervised administration, unless the decedent’s will expressly provided otherwise____ *210 Further, A.R.S. § 14-3504 provides as follows: Unless restricted by the court, a supervised…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.