Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16-960 (2026)

Severability

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 

(Caution: 1998 Prop. 105 applies)

 

If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable. In any court challenge to the validity of this article, the commission and Arizonans for clean elections shall have standing to intervene.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Citizens Clean Elections Comm'n v. Myers, 1 P.3d 706 (Ariz. 2000).
Citizens Clean Elections Comm'n v. Myers, 1 P.3d 706 (Ariz. 2000). · cites it 6× “Severability—Commission on Appellate Court Appointments ¶ 23 Citizens for Clean Elections Commission and Arizonans for Clean Elections argue that even if part of the Act is unconstitutional, that part is severable and the remainder of the Act can function.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.