Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 25
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1051 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

25-1051. Definitions

In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Petitioner" means a person who seeks enforcement of an order for return of a child under the Hague convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction or enforcement of a child custody determination.

2. "Respondent" means a person against whom a proceeding has been commenced for enforcement of an order for return of a child under the Hague convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction or enforcement of a child custody determination.  

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2014 · leading case: Angel B. v. Vanessa J., 316 P.3d 1257 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Angel B. v. Vanessa J., 316 P.3d 1257 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “abuse, dependency, guardianship, paternity, termination of parental rights and protection from domestic violence, in which legal custody, physical custody or visitation with respect to a child is an issue or in which that issue may appear, (b) Does not include a proceeding…”
Duwyenie v. Moran, 207 P.3d 754 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: "A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051 through 25-1067].” 8 . In ils…”
Antanelle Duwyenie v. William C. Moran (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “7 Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: “A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051 through 25- 1067].” 8 Carlos…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.