Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-743 (2026)

Disciplinary proceedings; notice; hearings; attorney general representation; judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

32-743. Disciplinary proceedings; notice; hearings; attorney general representation; judicial review

A. The board may initiate disciplinary proceedings under this chapter, for cause, either on its own motion or a verified complaint pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10.

B. A written notice stating the nature of the charge or charges against a registrant and the time and place of a hearing before the board on the charges shall be served at least twenty days before the date of the hearing either personally or by mailing a copy of the notice, by certified mail, to the address last known to the board.

C. If, after having been served with the notice of hearing, the person fails to appear at the hearing and defend, the board may proceed to hear evidence against the person and may enter an order as is justified by the evidence.

D. At all hearings the attorney general of this state, one of the attorney general's assistants or a special assistant designated by the attorney general shall appear and represent the board.

E. The decision of the board shall be by majority vote.  Any person aggrieved by the decision may file a motion for a rehearing pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10.

F. Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H, the board's final decision is subject to judicial review pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1971–1979 · leading case: Sarwark v. Thorneycroft, 596 P.2d 1173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sarwark v. Thorneycroft, 596 P.2d 1173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “§ 32-1159; and Accountants, A.R.S. § 32-743. From the standpoint of logic, we see no reason why a barber can review the suspension of his license all the way to the supreme court, but a pharmacist cannot.”
Welsh v. Arizona State Bd. of Acct., 484 P.2d 201 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “Therein A.R.S. § 32-743, subsec. J expressly authorizes the utilization of the Administrative Review Act in relation to the Board’s action in disciplinary matters and the Chapter is silent as to the utilization of the Administrative Review Act in instances where the Board…”
Meyer v. Campbell, 480 P.2d 22 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). “C (Psychologists); § 32-743, as amended (Accountants); § 32-554, as .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.