Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 36
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-436.02 (2026)

Increases of rates or charges; filing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. A hospital or nursing care institution shall not increase any rate or charge until the proposed increase has been filed with the director and reviewed in the same manner as the schedule set forth in section 36-436.

B. A copy of any proposed reduction in any rate or charge shall be filed with the director for informational purposes prior to the effective date of such reduction.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2014 · leading case: Banner Health v. Med. Sav. Ins., 163 P.3d 1096 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Banner Health v. Med. Sav. Ins., 163 P.3d 1096 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 12× “A.R.S. § 36-436.02. DHS regulations enacted pursuant to Article 3 specify the time, place, and manner by which a hospital must file its schedule of charges with the director, but do not indicate any method of substantive review the director should take concerning those schedules.”
LaBombard v. Samaritan Health Sys., 991 P.2d 246 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. 36-436.02(A). Finally, hospi- *552 tais must file a copy of proposed reductions in rates or charges with DHS “for informational purposes” before the reduced rate becomes effective.”
Abbott v. Banner Health Network, 341 P.3d 478 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “§ 36-436 (2009) (filing and review of rates and rules as prerequisite to operation); A.R.S. § 36-436.02(A) (2009) (increases of rates or charges; filing); 42 U.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-436.02(A) — 3 cases
Banner Health v. Med. Sav. Ins., 163 P.3d 1096 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “A.R.S. § 36-436.02. DHS regulations enacted pursuant to Article 3 specify the time, place, and manner by which a hospital must file its schedule of charges with the director, but do not indicate any method of substantive review the director should take concerning those schedules.”
LaBombard v. Samaritan Health Sys., 991 P.2d 246 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998). “A.R.S. 36-436.02(A). Finally, hospi- *552 tais must file a copy of proposed reductions in rates or charges with DHS “for informational purposes” before the reduced rate becomes effective.”
Abbott v. Banner Health Network, 341 P.3d 478 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “§ 36-436 (2009) (filing and review of rates and rules as prerequisite to operation); A.R.S. § 36-436.02(A) (2009) (increases of rates or charges; filing); 42 U.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-436.02(B) — 2 cases
Banner Health v. Med. Sav. Ins., 163 P.3d 1096 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “A.R.S. § 36-436.02. DHS regulations enacted pursuant to Article 3 specify the time, place, and manner by which a hospital must file its schedule of charges with the director, but do not indicate any method of substantive review the director should take concerning those schedules.”
LaBombard v. Samaritan Health Sys., 991 P.2d 246 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998). “A.R.S. 36-436.02(A). Finally, hospi- *552 tais must file a copy of proposed reductions in rates or charges with DHS “for informational purposes” before the reduced rate becomes effective.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.