Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1721 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Bakery rack" means a metal frame that holds bakery trays or other bakery products and that is used by a bakery, distributor or retailer or its agent as a means to transport, store or carry bakery products.

2. "Bakery tray" means a wire or plastic receptacle that holds bread, buns or other baked goods and that is used by a bakery, distributor or retailer or its agent as a means to transport, store or carry bakery products.

3. "Container" means a bakery rack, bakery tray, dairy case, egg basket or merchandise pallet.

4. "Dairy case" means a plastic receptacle that holds sixteen quarts or more of beverage and that is used by a dairy, distributor or retailer or its agent as a means to transport, store or carry dairy products.

5. "Egg basket" means a wire or plastic receptacle that holds four dozen or more shell eggs and that is used by a processor, distributor or retailer or its agent as a means to transport, store or carry eggs.

6. "Merchandise pallet" means a wooden or plastic carrier or holder used by a manufacturer or distributor to transport merchandise to wholesale and retail outlets.

7. "Name or mark" means a permanently affixed or permanently stamped name or mark that satisfies the requirements of section 44-1722 and that is used for the purpose of identifying the owner of the containers.

8. "Parking area" means a lot or other property provided by a recipient for the use of its customers to park vehicles while at the recipient's establishment.

9. "Recipient" means a person, firm, corporation or association that is authorized by the owner to use an owner's container.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1980–1988 · leading case: People Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Green Acres Trust, 618 P.2d 1086 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
People Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Green Acres Trust, 618 P.2d 1086 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 8× “RULINGS BY THE TRIAL COURT The attorney general eventually moved for summary judgment, principally upon the ground that the plans offered by appel-lees were generically “prearranged funeral plan agreements” within the purview of A.R.S. §§ 44-1721 to -1725 but did not comply with…”
London v. Green Acres Trust, 765 P.2d 538 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “In essence, defendants’ sales personnel were selling prepaid funeral plans in violation of A.R.S. § 44-1721 et seq. (Current version at A.”
Merrick v. Rottman, 663 P.2d 586 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “In 1979, Merrick prepared and marketed a prearranged funeral plan which in the opinion of Merrick’s counsel complied with the provisions of A.R.S. § 44-1721, et seq. (Title 44, chapter 11, Article 8, “Prearranged Funeral Plans”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.