Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-1792 (2026)

Exemption

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article does not apply to:

1. Any private club owned and operated by its members, any facility owned or operated by the state of Arizona or any of its political subdivisions, any health spa operated by a fraternal or benevolent society organized under title 10, chapter 19, article 3 or a nonprofit corporation organized under title 10, chapters 24 through 40, or any health care institution licensed pursuant to title 36, chapter 4.

2. Any health spa that does not require or in the ordinary course of business receive prepayment for services. For the purposes of this paragraph, payment for health spa services received within the thirty-one days in which the services are to be rendered does not constitute prepayment. A health spa that intends to begin requiring or receiving prepayment for health spa services shall comply with this article.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc., 417 N.W.2d 102 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc., 417 N.W.2d 102 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 44-1792 (Supp.1986); Conn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.