Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 44
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-7001 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

44-7001. Short title

This chapter may be cited as the Arizona electronic transactions act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2021 · leading case: Haywood Sec., Inc. v. Ehrlich, 149 P.3d 738 (Ariz. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Haywood Sec., Inc. v. Ehrlich, 149 P.3d 738 (Ariz. 2007). · cites it 4× “This court concludes that neither Arizona Supreme Court Rule 124 nor Arizona’s Electronic *116 Transactions Act, A.R.S. §§ 44-7001 et seq., addresses or changes the requirements of Rule 58(a).”
Young v. Rose, 286 P.3d 518 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. §§ 44-7001 through - 7052. ¶ 10 After briefing and oral argument, the superior court granted the motion to dismiss.”
Progressive Cas. Ins. v. Est. of Palomera-Ruiz, 231 P.3d 384 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “Here, because the only notice Progressive extended to the insured was oral, it failed to satisfy A.”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker, 786 S.E.2d 200 (W. Va. 2016). “195 (2008); Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 44-7001 to -7051 (2003 & Supp.”
GlobalTranz Enter. Inc. v. Murphy (D. Ariz. 2020). · cites it 2× “64 at 2 [“Murphy seeks to add an affirmative 23 defense (failure to comply with A.R.S. §44-7001, et. seq. concerning electronic signatures) 24 and two additional claims (Abuse of Process and Intentional Interference with Contract or 25 Business Expectancy).”
Rigsby v. GoDaddy Inc. (D. Ariz. 2021). · cites it 2× “Defendants interpret the Third Amended Complaint to 23 invoke A.R.S. § 44-7001, et seq., the Arizona Electronic Transactions Act, under which a 24 “contract formed by an electronic record cannot be denied legal effect and enforceability 25 solely because an electronic record was…”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (W. Va. 2016). “195 (2008); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 44-7001 to -7051 (2003 & Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.