Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 45-405 (2026)

Judicial review of decisions of the director; assignment of actions for judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. This section and sections 45-406 and 45-407 govern all actions for judicial review of decisions of the director under this chapter, except those decisions made pursuant to section 45-476.01, subsection E. An action for judicial review under this chapter extends to all questions of law and fact presented by the record.

B. Administrative and public hearings shall be recorded manually or electronically. If the person seeks judicial review of a decision of the director, a transcript shall be made as provided by law.

C. Each action for judicial review under this chapter shall be assigned to a judge whom the chief justice of the supreme court has specifically designated, pursuant to section 45-406, to hear actions for judicial review under this chapter.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1987 · leading case: Seven Springs Ranch, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Dep't of Water Resources, 753 P.2d 161 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Seven Springs Ranch, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Dep't of Water Resources, 753 P.2d 161 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “Salt River Project, an owner of wells in the basin, requested a rehearing pursuant to A.R.S. § 45-405. The rehearing was held in October 1982, subsequent to published notice and actual notice to all who had attended the April hearing.”

Cortaro Water Users' Ass'n v. Steiner, 714 P.2d 836 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “The Proceedings before the Superior Court On July 6, 1982, Tucson filed a complaint in the superior court against the Department and Cortaro pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 45-405 and 45-406 of the groundwater code, and A.”

Cortaro Water Users'ass'n v. Steiner, 714 P.2d 836 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “The Proceedings before the Superior Court On July 6, 1982, Tucson filed a complaint in the superior court against the Department and Cortaro pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 45-405 and 45-406 of the groundwater code, and A.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 45-405(B) — 1 case

Seven Springs Ranch, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Dep't of Water Resources, 753 P.2d 161 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). “Salt River Project, an owner of wells in the basin, requested a rehearing pursuant to A.R.S. § 45-405. The rehearing was held in October 1982, subsequent to published notice and actual notice to all who had attended the April hearing.”

— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 45-405(E) — 2 cases

Cortaro Water Users' Ass'n v. Steiner, 714 P.2d 836 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “The Proceedings before the Superior Court On July 6, 1982, Tucson filed a complaint in the superior court against the Department and Cortaro pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 45-405 and 45-406 of the groundwater code, and A.”

Cortaro Water Users'ass'n v. Steiner, 714 P.2d 836 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “The Proceedings before the Superior Court On July 6, 1982, Tucson filed a complaint in the superior court against the Department and Cortaro pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 45-405 and 45-406 of the groundwater code, and A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.