Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-1101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

47-1101. Short title

A. This title may be cited as the uniform commercial code.

B. This chapter may be cited as uniform commercial code - general provisions.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “We must determine whether under A.R.S. §§ 47-1101, et seq., Arizona's version of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), [1] a perfected security interest in goods removed to Arizona from the state of original perfection prevails "against a subsequent judgment lien arising out of an…”
Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 130 P.3d 530 (Ariz. 2006). · cites it 2× “…has no remedies. DaimlerChrysler acknowledged that Parrot "retains any common law” or other possible remedies. 7 . A.R.S. §§ 47-1101 to -10102 (2005).”
Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C., 55 P.3d 763 (Ariz. 2002). · cites it 2× “Although the parties did not raise the issue, this sale would fall within the scope of the Uniform *424 Commercial Code ("UCC”), A.R.S. §§ 47-1101 to 9501 (1997). As noted above, under UCC § 47-2720, rescission of a contract does not bar a claim for damages.”
Autonumerics, Inc. v. Bayer Indus., Inc., 696 P.2d 1330 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Autonumerics’ form acknowledgment, although adding the discount schedule, is likewise clearly an acceptance of the order for twenty-six basic control systems at the agreed upon per unit price.”
Indep. Nat'l Bank v. Westmoor Elec., Inc., 795 P.2d 210 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 47-1101 et seq. 1 It also does not deny that it received notification that WCI had assigned its rights to receive payments under the construction contract to the bank.”
Bus. Fin. Servs., Inc. v. AGN Dev. Corp., 694 P.2d 1217 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “This opinion will refer to the renumbered statutes contained in A.R.S. § 47-1101 et seq. 3 . At time of oral argument BFS points out that this check was returned for insufficient funds and therefore there is a fact issue as to when the check was actually paid.”
Connelly v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n ex rel. Benefit of Harborview Mortg. Loan Trust 2005-3 (In re Connelly), 487 B.R. 230 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2013). “Arizona has adopted the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") at ARS §§ 47-1101 through 47-4A507. Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code defines a "holder” as: "(a) The person in possession of a negotiable instrument that is payable either to bearer or to an identified person that…”
Betterton v. First Interstate Bank of Arizona, 615 F. Supp. 72 (E.D. Mo. 1985). “Count III — Conversion Although the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by Arizona, Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 47-1101 et seq. (1984), does not expressly provide for an action in conversion arising out of the improper sale of repossessed property, Arizona courts have construed the…”
Elf Atochem North Am., Inc. v. Celco, Inc., 927 P.2d 355 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “section 47-1101 et seq., was adopted in 1967.”
Landon v. Stroud (Baird), 709 P.2d 565 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “The Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Arizona has been recodified at §§ 47-1101 et seq. See Laws 1984, Ch. 77, §§ 2, 3, and 29.”
Fogler v. Casa Grande Cotton Fin. Co. (In Re Allen), 134 B.R. 373 (9th Cir. BAP 1991). “A.R.S. § 47-1101. Article 9 generally does not apply to the “creation or transfer of an interest in or lien on real estate, including a lease or rents thereunder.”
Bill Parrot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. (Ariz. 2006). · cites it 2× “In the section governing revocation of acceptance of a lease, lessors and lessees may agree to be bound by the Lemon Law and 7 A.R.S. §§ 47-1101 to -10102 (2005). - 18 - not by the Uniform Commercial Code: The lessee and lessor may, by a conspicuous writing contained in the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.