Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 47
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-1205 (2026)

Reasonable time; "seasonably"

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

47-1205. Reasonable time; "seasonably"

A. Whether a time for taking an action required by this title is reasonable depends on the nature, purpose and circumstances of the action.

B. An action is taken seasonably if it is taken at or within the time agreed or, if no time is agreed, at or within a reasonable time.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1996 · leading case: Keith Equip. Co. v. Casa Grande Cotton Fin. Co., 928 P.2d 683 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Keith Equip. Co. v. Casa Grande Cotton Fin. Co., 928 P.2d 683 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “Course of dealing is defined as “a sequence of previous conduct between the parties to a particular transaction which is fairly to be regarded as establishing a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.”
Koenen v. Royal Buick Co., 783 P.2d 822 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Course of dealing is “a sequence of previous conduct between the parties to a particular transaction which is fairly to be regarded as establishing a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.”
City of Phoenix v. Great W. Bank & Trust, 712 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “) “Course of dealing” is defined in § 47-1205 as “a sequence of previous conduct between the parties to a particular transaction which is fairly to be regarded as establishing a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-1205(A): 1 case
Keith Equip. Co. v. Casa Grande Cotton Fin. Co., 928 P.2d 683 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “Course of dealing is defined as “a sequence of previous conduct between the parties to a particular transaction which is fairly to be regarded as establishing a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.