A. A city or town heretofore incorporated desiring to be reincorporated may, upon petition of a majority of its qualified electors to the board of supervisors of the county in which the city or town is situated, by order of the board of county supervisors, be disincorporated and reincorporated by whatever corporate name the petition may designate. In such case, the officers of the city or town, at the date of the disincorporation, shall deliver to the officers of the city or town so incorporated all books, papers, records, money and other property pertaining to the city or town disincorporated, and the city or town incorporated shall be liable for all debts and liabilities of the city or town disincorporated, and shall be entitled to receive all property and rights of action belonging to the disincorporated city or town.
B. The reincorporation of a city or town shall not affect or change title to any property or rights therein, or any tax levy that may have been made, or outstanding certificates of taxes, and the new corporation may issue necessary title papers under tax sales, or other sales, the same as a city or town can do under existing laws.
C. The ordinances and resolutions existing in the city or town at the time the petition is filed shall continue and be in force for sixty days thereafter, unless repealed or changed by the proper authorities of the city or town reincorporated.
Notes of Decisions
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 17× “In analyzing the meaning of the Idaho UCC § 9-103 in the context of a priority contest between two security interests in equipment moved from Idaho to Wyoming, the court stated: As we read section 9-103(1)(d), failure to reperfect within four months carries two distinct…”
Arrow Ford, Inc. v. W. Landscape Constr. Co., 532 P.2d 553 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975).
· cites it 6× “§ 9-103, comment 7, explains: “ . . . The four month period is long enough for a secured party to discover in most cases that the collateral has been removed and to file in this state; thereafter, if he has not done so, his interest .”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-103(1): 2 cases
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
“In analyzing the meaning of the Idaho UCC § 9-103 in the context of a priority contest between two security interests in equipment moved from Idaho to Wyoming, the court stated: As we read section 9-103(1)(d), failure to reperfect within four months carries two distinct…”
Arrow Ford, Inc. v. W. Landscape Constr. Co., 532 P.2d 553 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975).
“§ 9-103, comment 7, explains: “ . . . The four month period is long enough for a secured party to discover in most cases that the collateral has been removed and to file in this state; thereafter, if he has not done so, his interest .”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-103(1)(d): 1 case
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
“In analyzing the meaning of the Idaho UCC § 9-103 in the context of a priority contest between two security interests in equipment moved from Idaho to Wyoming, the court stated: As we read section 9-103(1)(d), failure to reperfect within four months carries two distinct…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-103(1)(d)(i): 1 case
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
“In analyzing the meaning of the Idaho UCC § 9-103 in the context of a priority contest between two security interests in equipment moved from Idaho to Wyoming, the court stated: As we read section 9-103(1)(d), failure to reperfect within four months carries two distinct…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-103(3): 1 case
Arrow Ford, Inc. v. W. Landscape Constr. Co., 532 P.2d 553 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975).
“§ 9-103, comment 7, explains: “ . . . The four month period is long enough for a secured party to discover in most cases that the collateral has been removed and to file in this state; thereafter, if he has not done so, his interest .”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-103(l)(d): 1 case
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
“In analyzing the meaning of the Idaho UCC § 9-103 in the context of a priority contest between two security interests in equipment moved from Idaho to Wyoming, the court stated: As we read section 9-103(1)(d), failure to reperfect within four months carries two distinct…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-103(l)(d)(i): 1 case
Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue Serv., 745 P.2d 966 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987).
“In analyzing the meaning of the Idaho UCC § 9-103 in the context of a priority contest between two security interests in equipment moved from Idaho to Wyoming, the court stated: As we read section 9-103(1)(d), failure to reperfect within four months carries two distinct…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.