Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 9
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-104 (2026)

County services for newly incorporated city or town

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. When county territory is included within the boundaries of a newly incorporated city or town, all codes, rules and regulations made, established, adopted or enacted by such county, relating to zoning, building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical and health and sanitation shall apply within such newly incorporated city or town and shall be enforced by county officers from and after the date of such incorporation until July 1 next following such incorporation or until such time prior to the expiration of such fiscal year as the governing body of such city or town, by resolution or conflicting ordinance, supersedes such county code, rules or regulations.

B. All county services previously provided within such territory, including, but not limited to, law enforcement, public safety, maintenance of streets and public improvements, drainage, sewers and sewage disposal shall be continued through county officers and at county expense during the period from and after the date of such incorporation until July 1 next following such incorporation or until such time prior to the end of such fiscal year as the governing body of such city or town, by resolution or conflicting ordinances, provides such services.

C. The provisions of this section shall also apply to cities and towns incorporated under article 3 of this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–2012 · leading case: Town of Marana v. Pima Cnty., 281 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Marana v. Pima Cnty., 281 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 15× “As a corollary, the Town also contended it was entitled to summary judgment declaring that, under A.R.S. § 9-104(B) (2008), the County has no authority to provide sewer services to customers residing in the Town without the Town’s consent.”
Black, Robertshaw, Frederick, Copple & Wright, P. C . v. United States, 634 P.2d 398 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 3× “§ 9-104], none of which are claimed to be applicable here.”
Valley Nat'l Bank v. Cotton Growers Hail Ins., 747 P.2d 1225 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 3× “§ 9-104(i). See Annotation, Effect of U. C.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-104(B) — 1 case
Town of Marana v. Pima Cnty., 281 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). “As a corollary, the Town also contended it was entitled to summary judgment declaring that, under A.R.S. § 9-104(B) (2008), the County has no authority to provide sewer services to customers residing in the Town without the Town’s consent.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-104(b) — 1 case
Town of Marana v. Pima Cnty., 281 P.3d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). “As a corollary, the Town also contended it was entitled to summary judgment declaring that, under A.R.S. § 9-104(B) (2008), the County has no authority to provide sewer services to customers residing in the Town without the Town’s consent.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-104(f) — 1 case
Black, Robertshaw, Frederick, Copple & Wright, P. C . v. United States, 634 P.2d 398 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). “§ 9-104], none of which are claimed to be applicable here.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-104(i) — 1 case
Valley Nat'l Bank v. Cotton Growers Hail Ins., 747 P.2d 1225 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1987). “§ 9-104(i). See Annotation, Effect of U. C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.