Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-475 (2026)

Filing of map; hearing; approval; recording

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. One copy of the plat or map shall be filed with the city or town and the other copy with the board of supervisors of the county in which the subdivision is situated, to which shall be attached the petition of the owner praying for the approval of the plat or map.

B. The board of supervisors shall set the petition for hearing not less than fifteen and not more than thirty days from the date of the filing of the plat or map and petition with the board, and shall cause written notice thereof to be given to the governing body of the city or town. The city or town may appear at the hearing and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Upon the hearing, if it appears to the board that the plat or map reasonably conforms to legal requirements it shall approve and endorse the approval upon the plat or map and transmit it to the county recorder of the county for filing.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1966–2002 · leading case: Robinson v. Lintz, 420 P.2d 923 (Ariz. 1966).
Robinson v. Lintz, 420 P.2d 923 (Ariz. 1966). · cites it 30× “If the Board is deemed to have authority to detain development of one's land for this length of time what is to prevent it from holding a landowner in absolute limbo for a year or two while the landowner pays taxes, pays interest on normally large loans for proposed…”
S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. State, 44 P.3d 1006 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “ADOR has made no arguments unique to Clifton Town Code § 9-475. The Town has joined in ADOR’s *329 answering brief on appeal and offered no argument of its own.”
Cnty. of Maricopa v. Anzwool, Inc., 506 P.2d 282 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 6× “The question presented for our determination is whether the Board should have approved and endorsed its approval upon the plat and transmitted it to the County Recorder for filing as provided by A.R.S. § 9-475, or whether the Board could hold in abeyance its approval until after…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.