This subchapter may be cited as the “Interstate Corrections Compact”.
History.
Acts 1973, No. 315, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 46-1401.
Research References
ALR.
Construction and Application of Interstate Corrections Compact and Implementing State Laws — Equivalency of Conditions and Rights and Responsibilities of Parties. 56 A.L.R.6th 553.
Notes of Decisions
Trujillo v. Williams, 465 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2006).
“§§ 31-491 to 31-492; Ark.Code Ann. §§ 12-49-101 to 12-49-103; Cal.”
Dubois v. Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 259 (Ark. 2014).
“Appellant contended in the petition that he was entitled under the Interstate Corrections Compact (“Compact”), codified at Arkansas Code Annotated sections 12-49-101 to -103 (Repl. 1999), to be transferred to a prison in California where his family resided.”
Graham v. Norris, 10 S.W.3d 457 (Ark. 2000).
· cites it 2× “While serving his sentence, Graham was transferred pursuant to the Interstate Corrections Compact ( Ark. Code Ann. § 12-49-101 (Repl. 1999)) to the Ellis County Jail in Arnett, Oklahoma; during his confinement there, he performed volunteer work authorized under Ark.”
Trujillo v. Williams (10th Cir. 2006).
“§§ 31-491 to 31-492; Ark. Code Ann. §§ 12-49-101 to 12-49-103; Cal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.