Certiorari relief was appropriate where a circuit court erred by disqualifying prosecutors and appointing a special prosecutor because there was no evidence that the prosecutors neglected a capital murder case or failed to attend court; the prosecutors attended and filed a nolle pros motion. There was no other remedy, and the circuit court exceeded its jurisdiction; however, the circuit court was not directed to nolle pros the case because review of a discretionary decision was not allowed where certiorari was sought.
Smith v. Simes, 2013 Ark. 477, 430 S.W.3d 690 (2013).
Bates v. Bates, 793 S.W.2d 788 (Ark. 1990). · cites it 4דSecond, *791 Ark.Code Ann. § 16-21-103 (1987) provides that the "prosecuting attorney shall commence and prosecute all criminal actions in which the state or any county in his district may be concerned.”
Smith v. Simes, 2013 Ark. 477, 430 S.W.3d 690. · cites it 2דWith regard to the statutory language “to prosecute as required by law,” Ark. Code Ann. § 16-21-103 (Repl.1999), “Duty to commence and prosecute criminal actions,” provides that “each prosecuting attorney shall commence and prosecute all criminal actions in which the State or…”
Hodges v. Lamora, 989 S.W.2d 530 (Ark. 1999). · cites it 2דSee Ark. Code Ann. § 16-21-103 (Repl. 1994). A sheriff has no authority to bring criminal charges or file suit to collect a debt owed to a county.”
United States v. Harmon, 995 F. Supp. 963 (E.D. Ark. 1998). · cites it 2דPursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated Section 16-21-103, it is the duty of the Prosecuting Attorney to commence and prosecute all criminal actions in which the state or any county in his district may be concerned.”
Breshears v. Little Rock, City of, No. 4:18-cv-00774 (E.D. Ark. June 25, 2020). · cites it 4ד30) at 17 (citing Ark. Code Ann. § 16-21-103 ). 189 S. Ark.”
Little Rock Fam. Plan. Servs. v. Jegley, No. 4:21-cv-00453 (E.D. Ark. July 20, 2021). · cites it 2ד” Ark. Code Ann. § 16-21-103 . Mr. Jegley is therefore responsible for criminal enforcement of the Act in Pulaski County (Dkt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.