Ark. Code Ann. » Title 16 Chapter 55
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (2026)

[Repealed.]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning definitions, was repealed by Acts 2003, No. 1185, § 186. The section was derived from Civil Code, Preliminary Provisions, §§ 3, 4; Civil Code, §§ 704, 705, 837-855; C. & M. Dig., §§ 1028, 1029, 1325, 1326, 9732-9750; Pope's Dig., §§ 1230, 1231, 1550, 1551, 13258-13276; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 27-106, 27-107, 27-109 — 27-115, 27-117 — 27-125, 27-127 — 27-129, 27-1201, 27-1202.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1989–2002 · leading case: Smith v. Wharton, 78 S.W.3d 79 (Ark. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Wharton, 78 S.W.3d 79 (Ark. 2002). · cites it 20× “On appeal, Kathleen raises two points of error: First, that the trial court erred in concluding that the trust and trust documents were signed in compliance with Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (A)(20) (1987); and second, that the trial court erred in allowing testimony by the…”
Smith v. Smith, 770 S.W.2d 205 (Ark. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (a)(16) (1987) provides that "[p]rocess means a writ or summons issued in the course of judicial proceedings.”
Sosebee v. Cnty. Line Sch. Dist., 897 S.W.2d 556 (Ark. 1995). · cites it 4× “]” Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (a)(2) (1987).”
Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs. v. Clark, 810 S.W.2d 331 (Ark. 1991). · cites it 2× “Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (a) (16) (1987) provides that “[p]rocess means a writ or summons issued in the course of judicial proceedings.”
Two Bros. Farm, Inc. v. Riceland Foods, Inc., 940 S.W.2d 889 (Ark. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (11) (1987). Appellants argue that Pulaski County is an appropriate venue in this action against Riceland because Riceland is either an association or a corporation.”
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102(a)(2): 1 case
Sosebee v. Cnty. Line Sch. Dist., 897 S.W.2d 556 (Ark. 1995). “]” Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (a)(2) (1987).”
Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102(a)(20): 1 case
Smith v. Wharton, 78 S.W.3d 79 (Ark. 2002). “On appeal, Kathleen raises two points of error: First, that the trial court erred in concluding that the trust and trust documents were signed in compliance with Ark. Code Ann. § 16-55-102 (A)(20) (1987); and second, that the trial court erred in allowing testimony by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.