Ark. Code Ann. » Title 16 Chapter 93
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 16-93-1201 (2026)

Findings and determinations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. The State of Arkansas hereby finds that the cost of incarcerating the ever-increasing numbers of offenders in traditional penitentiaries is skyrocketing, bringing added fiscal pressures on state government, and that some inmates can be effectively punished, with little risk to the public, in a more affordable manner through the use of community correction programs and nontraditional facilities.
  2. As a result of the rising cost of traditional incarceration, the state finds that the purpose of corrections in Arkansas is twofold:
    1. “Community correction”, defined as both nontraditional correction centers and nonresidential community corrections, including supervision on probation, parole, and transfer, is charged with the provision of correction focused on promoting offender accountability and the supervision of offenders at appropriate levels to promote public safety; and
      1. “Institutions”, defined as traditional prison beds, are charged with the appropriate incapacitation of high risk offenders.
      2. “Incapacitation” involves traditional aspects of incarceration coupled with highly supervised community correction when appropriate.
      3. “High risk” is defined as those convicted of the most serious offenses, those who have longer criminal histories, and those who have repeatedly failed to comply with conditions imposed under less restrictive sanctions.
  3. Furthermore, the state determines that services designed to address offender needs must be integrated into the framework of both institutions and community correction programs and must be balanced with supervision and correction such that the community is repaid for the offense, public safety is promoted through supervision, and the offender is assisted in becoming a law-abiding member of society.

History. Acts 1993, No. 531, § 1; 1993, No. 548, § 1; 2005, No. 1994, § 287.

Amendments. The 2005 amendment substituted “correction” for “punishment” throughout this section; and redesignated former (b)(1), (b)(1)(A) and (b)(1)(B) as present (b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B) and (b)(1)(C).

Case Notes

Cited: Arnold v. State, 2011 Ark. 395, 384 S.W.3d 488 (2011).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1999–2019 · leading case: Arnold v. State, 384 S.W.3d 488 (Ark. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arnold v. State, 384 S.W.3d 488 (Ark. 2011). · cites it 11× “2009) and Arkansas Code Annotated sections 16-93-1201 to -1210 (Supp.1995 & Repl.”
Bolin v. State, 459 S.W.3d 788 (Ark. 2015). · cites it 2× “Bolin’s plea agreement and judgment- and-disposition order state that he was eligible to have his convictions for two misdemeanors and a Class D felony sealed pursuant to Act 531 of 1993, known as the Community Punishment Act, codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-93-1201 to -1210.…”
Fulmer v. State, 987 S.W.2d 700 (Ark. 1999). · cites it 2× “] It is clear from the language of subsection (b)(1) that the circuit court has the ability to expunge an offender’s criminal record if the offender (1) has successfully completed a sentence under the Community Punishment Act, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-93-1201 to -1210 (Supp.”
State of Arkansas v. Kentara Brown, 2019 Ark. 395 (Ark. 2019). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-93-1201 to -1210 (Repl.”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 16-93-1201(a) — 1 case
Arnold v. State, 384 S.W.3d 488 (Ark. 2011). “2009) and Arkansas Code Annotated sections 16-93-1201 to -1210 (Supp.1995 & Repl.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.