Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 17-19-105 (2026)

Prohibitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No professional bail bondsman or professional bail bond company, nor court, nor law enforcement officer, nor any individual working on behalf of a professional bail bondsman or professional bail bond company, shall:

  1. Require as a condition of his or her executing a bail bond that the principal agree to engage the services of a specified attorney;
  2. Solicit business or advertise for business in or about any place where prisoners are confined or in or about any court;
  3. Suggest or advise the engagement of any bail bond company or professional bail bondsman to underwrite a bail bond;
  4. Enter a police station, jail, sheriff's office, or other place where persons in custody of the law are detained for the purpose of obtaining employment as a professional bail bondsman or professional bail bond company, without having been previously called by a person so detained or by some relative or other authorized person acting for or in behalf of the person so detained. Whenever such an entry occurs, the person in charge of the facility shall be given and promptly record the mission of the licensee and the name of the person calling the licensee and requesting him or her to come;
  5. Pay a fee or rebate or give or promise anything of value to:
    1. A jailer, police officer, peace officer, committing magistrate, or any other person who has power to arrest or to hold in custody; or
    2. Any public official or public employee in order to secure a settlement, compromise, remission, or reduction of the amount of any bail bond or estreatment thereof;
  6. Pay a fee or rebate or give anything of value to an attorney in bail bond matters, except in defense of any action on a bond;
  7. Pay a fee or rebate or give or promise anything of value to the principal or anyone in his or her behalf;
    1. Participate in the capacity of an attorney at a trial or hearing of one on whose bond he or she is surety;
    2. Attempt to obtain settlement or dismissal of a case;
    3. Give or attempt to give any legal advice to one on whose bond he or she is surety; or
  8. Accept anything of value from a principal except the premium, provided that the licensee shall be permitted to accept collateral security or other indemnity from the principal which shall be returned upon final termination of liability on the bond. The collateral security or other indemnity required by the licensee must be reasonable in relation to the amount of the bond.

History. Acts 1989, No. 417, § 1; 1997, No. 973, § 5.

Case Notes

Evidence.

Evidence was sufficient to establish a violation of this section based upon allegations that a friend of a licensed bail bondsman accompanied the bail bondsman to a county jail and distributed business cards of the bail bondsman to a trusty and others at the facility where (1) the bail bondsman left her friend with access to her business cards and cellular phone and gave instructions to obtain certain information from the callers regarding their bonding needs, (2) the cards had the bail bondsman's cellular phone number on them, and (3) the bail bondsman left her friend outside the jail while she was inside preparing a bond. Frawley v. Nickolich, 73 Ark. App. 231, 41 S.W.3d 420 (2001).

Cited: Ark. Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, 348 Ark. 48, 69 S.W.3d 855 (2002).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2002 · leading case: Arkansas Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, 69 S.W.3d 855 (Ark. 2002).
Arkansas Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, 69 S.W.3d 855 (Ark. 2002). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 17-19-105 (Repl. 2001) (prohibiting bondsmen or bond companies from giving or promising anything of value to a person who has power to hold in custody).”
Frawley v. Nickolich, 41 S.W.3d 420 (Ark. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “Ark. Code Ann. § 17-19-105 (2) (Supp.1999).”
Ark. Code Ann. § 17-19-105(2): 1 case
Frawley v. Nickolich, 41 S.W.3d 420 (Ark. Ct. App. 2001). “Ark. Code Ann. § 17-19-105 (2) (Supp.1999).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.