Arkansas Code Annotated
Ark. Code Ann. § 17-19-211 (2026)
[Repealed.]
✓ current as of May 2026
Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning administrative penalty, was repealed by Acts 2011, No. 97, § 2. The section was derived from Acts 1989, No. 417, § 1; 1995, No. 827, § 5; 1997, No. 973, § 7.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2001–2011 · leading case: Arkansas Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, 69 S.W.3d 855 (Ark. 2002).
Arkansas Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, 69 S.W.3d 855 (Ark. 2002). “In addition, Arkansas Code Annotated § 17-19-211 (Repl. 2001) provides for an alternative sanction of an administrative penalty not to exceed $5000 against a licensee where grounds exist for the suspension or revocation of the license.”
Hester v. Arkansas Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd., 383 S.W.3d 925 (Ark. Ct. App. 2011). “Arkansas Code Annotated section 17-19-211 (Repl.1997) provides for an alternative sanction of an administrative penalty not to exceed $5,000 against a licensee where grounds exist for suspension or revocation of the license.”
Frawley v. Nickolich, 41 S.W.3d 420 (Ark. Ct. App. 2001). “Likewise, J &J Bonding’s fine of $2500, in lieu of suspension or revocation of its license as an administrative penalty pursuant to section 17-19-211, was in the mid-range of fines.”
Mann v. Arkansas Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd., 199 S.W.3d 84 (Ark. Ct. App. 2004). “He asserts that a more appropriate penalty would have been a fine as permitted by Ark. Code Ann. § 17-19-211 (Repl. 2001). In response, the Board states that revocation was appropriate because Mann’s license had been suspended within the previous twenty-four months.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.