Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 28-14-107 (2026)

Ownership on death of owner

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

On death of a sole owner or the last to die of all multiple owners, ownership of securities registered in beneficiary form passes to the beneficiary or beneficiaries who survive all owners. On proof of death of all owners and compliance with any applicable requirements of the registering entity, a security registered in beneficiary form may be reregistered in the name of the beneficiary or beneficiaries who survived the death of all owners. Until division of the security after the death of all owners, multiple beneficiaries surviving the death of all owners hold their interests as tenants in common. If no beneficiary survives the death of all owners, the security belongs to the estate of the deceased sole owner or the estate of the last to die of all multiple owners.

History. Acts 1993, No. 114, § 7.

Case Notes

Jurisdiction.

In creditor's action to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance arising from a transfer-on-death (TOD) beneficiary designation, the circuit court erroneously ruled that the probate court had exclusive jurisdiction and that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction; under Ark. Const. Amend. 80, § 6, and the fact that, under the Uniform Transfer on Death Security Registration Act, § 28-14-101 et seq., the money transferred from the TOD account did not become part of the estate, the circuit court clearly had jurisdiction. Heritage Props. Ltd. P'ship v. Walt & Lee Keenihan Found., Inc., 2019 Ark. 371, 584 S.W.3d 685 (2019).

Separate Property.

Administratrix, wife of the decedent, who sought to divorce the decedent but reconciled shortly before the decedent's death, convinced the trial court the monies in a transfer-on-death account (TOD account) naming children from the decedent's former marriage as the beneficiaries was a fraudulent transfer; if the TOD account was owned by both the decedent and the administratrix, the administratrix could claim dower rights in the property, but decedent's children presented compelling facts that the account was separate property owned by the decedent, and the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the administratrix. Ginsburg v. Ginsburg, 353 Ark. 816, 120 S.W.3d 567 (2003).

Where decedent and his surviving spouse were married for only four years, the trial court did not clearly err in finding that the transfer-on-death (TOD) account was the sole and separate property of decedent's three children by a prior marriage as the named beneficiaries of the TOD account; the funds used to purchase the account were gained as the result of the sale of decedent's business, which he acquired before his marriage to the surviving spouse and continued to hold as his separate property during the course of the marriage, and the surviving spouse admittedly had no ownership interest in the business, nor was their commingling of any funds between the surviving spouse and the decedent once they were married. Ginsburg v. Ginsburg, 359 Ark. 226, 195 S.W.3d 898 (2004).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2004 · leading case: Ginsburg v. Ginsburg, 120 S.W.3d 567 (Ark. 2003).
Ginsburg v. Ginsburg, 120 S.W.3d 567 (Ark. 2003). · cites it 4× “In support of their argument, appellants cite Chapter 14 of the Uniform Transfer on Death Security Registration Act, codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 28-14-107 (Supp. 2001), which provides: On death of a sole owner or the last to die of all multiple owners, ownership of securities…”
Ginsburg v. Ginsburg, 195 S.W.3d 898 (Ark. 2004). · cites it 2× “Thus, pursuant to section 28-14-107, TOD accounts are payable to the beneficiary or beneficiaries upon the death of the owner; they do not become assets of the owner’s estate unless no designated beneficiary survives the death of the owner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.