Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 4-32-901 (2026)

Dissolution

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A limited liability company is dissolved and its affairs shall be wound up upon the happening of the first to occur of the following:

  1. At the time or upon the occurrence of events specified in writing in the articles of organization or an operating agreement, but if no such time is set forth in either of the foregoing, then the limited liability company shall have a perpetual existence;
  2. The written consent of all members;
  3. At any time there are no members, provided that, unless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or an operating agreement, the limited liability company is not dissolved and is not required to be wound up if within ninety (90) days or such other period as is provided for in the articles of organization or an operating agreement after the occurrence of the event that terminated the continued membership of the last remaining member, the personal representative of the last remaining member agrees in writing to continue the limited liability company and to the admission of the personal representative of the member or its nominee or designee to the limited liability company as a member, effective as of the occurrence of the event that terminated the continued membership of the last remaining member; and
  4. The entry of a decree of judicial dissolution under § 4-32-902.

History. Acts 1993, No. 1003, § 901; 1999, No. 1528, § 2.

Amendments. The 1999 amendment rewrote this section.

Research References

ALR.

Construction and Application of Limited Liability Company Acts — Issues Relating to Dissolution and Winding Up of Affairs of Limited Liability Company. 49 A.L.R.6th 1.

Case Notes

Dissolution Denied.

Bankruptcy court could neither recognize the dissolution of an LLC nor judicially dissolve the LLC because dissolution of an Arkansas LLC occurred upon the happening of one of four enumerated events, none of which had occurred. Further, judicial dissolution was reserved by statute for a circuit court within the state of Arkansas, and the court would not expand the definition of circuit court to include a federal bankruptcy court. Caldwell v. Powell (In re Powell), 580 B.R. 822 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 2018).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Oliver v. Johanson, 329 F. Supp. 3d 684 (S.D.N.Y. 2018).
Oliver v. Johanson, 329 F. Supp. 3d 684 (S.D.N.Y. 2018). “This also likely explains why there is no separate cross-reference here to Ark. Code Ann. § 4-32-901 , which is the section on dissolution of the limited liability company.”
Oliver v. Johanson (W.D. Ark. 2018). · cites it 2× “This also likely explains why there is no separate cross- reference here to Ark. Code Ann. § 4-32-901 , which is the section on dissolution of the limited liability company.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.