Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-107 (2026)

[Repealed.]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Publisher's Notes. This section, concerning sexual misconduct, was repealed by Acts 2001, No. 1738, § 9. The section was derived from Acts 1975, No. 280, § 1807; A.S.A. 1947, § 41-1807; Acts 1997, No. 1037, § 1.

For present law, see §§ 5-14-1245-14-127.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1992–2004 · leading case: McDuffy v. State, 196 S.W.3d 12 (Ark. 2004).
McDuffy v. State, 196 S.W.3d 12 (Ark. 2004). · cites it 7× “McDuffy next claims that the circuit court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of sexual misconduct pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-107 , because there was a rational basis for the instruction.”
Bonds v. State, 837 S.W.2d 881 (Ark. 1992). · cites it 2× “Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-107 (a) (1987). Carnal abuse in the third degree and sexual misconduct are misdemeanor offenses.”
Holt v. State, 147 S.W.3d 699 (Ark. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “In support of this motion, appellant argued that because Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-107 (Repl. 1997), the statute defining sexual misconduct as a criminal offense, had been repealed before he entered his plea of nolo contendere, the judgment on that plea should be set aside.”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-107(a) — 1 case
McDuffy v. State, 196 S.W.3d 12 (Ark. 2004). “McDuffy next claims that the circuit court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of sexual misconduct pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-107 , because there was a rational basis for the instruction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.