Ark. Code Ann. » Title 5 Chapter 74
Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 5-74-101 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Arkansas Criminal Gang, Organization, or Enterprise Act”.

History. Acts 1993, No. 1002, § 1.

Research References

ALR.

Validity of Criminal State Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Acts and Similar Acts Related to Gang Activity and the Like. 58 A.L.R.6th 385.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2022 · leading case: Oliver v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 332 (Ark. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Oliver v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 332 (Ark. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” We agree that gravity was a factor, and given the evidence adduced at trial, we conclude that firing a gun into the air was indeed reckless and created a substantial risk of physical injury and/or property damage. Accordingly, we hold that there was substantial evidence to…”
State v. Zawodniak, 946 S.W.2d 936 (Ark. 1997). · cites it 2× “…Zawodniak argues § 5-74-106(a) is a part of the Arkansas Criminal Gang, Organization, or Enterprise Act codified in §§ 5-74-101 -108, and § 5-74-102 of that Act reflects that, to violate § 5-74-106(a), a person must also be shown to have been associated with "gang activity"…”
Husia Harkuf v. Leah Marony, Records Supervisor, Arkansas Dep't of Corr. Dexter Payne, Dir., Arkansas Dep't of Corr., 2022 Ark. 55 (Ark. 2022). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, Harkuf contends that he did not commit a prior violent felony as defined by the “Arkansas Gang, Organization, or Enterprise Act” codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-74-101 through – 203.”
Morgan v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 31 (Ark. Ct. App. 2016). “a part of the Arkansas Criminal Gang, Organization, or Enterprise Act codified at Arkansas Code Annotated §§ 5-74-101 to 108, did not require an element of gang activity, and it would be hesitant to interpret a legislative act in a manner contrary to its express language.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.