Dinkins v. State, 362 A.2d 91 (Md. 1976). · Go Syfert
Dinkins v. State, 362 A.2d 91 (Md. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Diaz v. State (mdctspecapp, 1999-11-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Diaz v. State (2×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1999 · signal: accord · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
the historical basis of the inference, however, does not guarantee its constitutionality. common law inferences must satisfy due process standards in light of present day experience.
examined Cited "see" Smith v. State (4×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dinkins v. State, 29 Md.App. 577 , 349 A.2d 676 , aff'd, 278 Md. 238 , 362 A.2d 91 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dinkins
v.
State of Maryland
[No. 59 (Adv.), September Term, 1976.].
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sep 1, 1976.
362 A.2d 91
Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (2)
Per Curiam:

Having granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Special Appeals in Dinkins v. State, 29 Md. App. 577, 349 A. 2d 676 (1976), and in accordance with Maryland Rule 811 d 3 having determined that no error of law appears in the decision, this Court adopts the comprehensive opinion of Chief- Judge Orth (now an[*239] Associate Judge of this Court) in that case and affirms the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

Judgment affirmed with costs; mandate to issue forthwith.