Abraham v. Dep't of Corr., 634 A.2d 214 (Pa. 1993). · Go Syfert
Abraham v. Dep't of Corr., 634 A.2d 214 (Pa. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Boyd v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (pacommwct, 2003-09-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Boyd v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (2×)
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Abraham v. Department of Corrections, 150 Pa.Cmwlth. 81 , 615 A.2d 814 (1992), affirmed, 535 Pa. 122 , 634 A.2d 214 (1993), overruled on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Tilghman, 543 Pa. 578 , 673 A.2d 898 (1996). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Tilghman (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Abraham v. Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 150 Pa. Commw. 81 , 615 A.2d 814 (1992), aff’d, 535 Pa. 122 , 634 A.2d 214 (1993) (aggregating consecutive sentences is mandatory; since this is not discretionary with the trial court, this interpretation of 42 Pa.C.S.A.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Jamison (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Abraham v. Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 150 Pa. Commw. 81 , 615 A.2d 814 (1992), aff'd, 535 Pa. 122 , 634 A.2d 214 (1993) (aggregating consecutive sentences is mandatory; since this is not discretionary with the trial court, this interpretation of 42 Pa.C.S.A.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Hall (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Abraham v. Department of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 150 Pa.Commw. 81, 615 A.2d 814 (1992), aff'd, 535 Pa. 122 , 634 A.2d 214 (1993) (aggregating consecutive sentences is mandatory; since this is not discretionary with the trial court, this interpretation of 42 Pa.C.S.A.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lynne ABRAHAM, District Attorney for the City and County of Philadelphia, Appellant
v.
The DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA; Robert P. Casey, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Joan Reeves, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Human Services; J. Patrick Gallagher, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Philadelphia Prison System; David Pingree, in his official capacity as Managing Director of Philadelphia; W. Wilson Goode, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Philadelphia; the City of Philadelphia; Reverend Albert F. Campbell, Labora M. Bennett, James D. Barber, Allen M. Hornblum, M. Mark Mendel, Donald J. Padova, each in his or her official capacity as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Philadelphia Prison System; Harry Moore, in his official capacity as Warden for Holmesburg Prison; Wilhelmina Speach, in her official capacity as Warden of the Detention Center; and Elsa Legesse, in her official capacity as Warden of the House of Correction, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 20, 1993.
634 A.2d 214
Nix, C.J., and Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy and Montemuro.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Sarah B. Vandenbraak, for District Atty.

William E. Fairall, Camp Hill, for Com.

James B. Jordan, Philadelphia, for City of Philadelphia.

John W. Packel, Philadelphia, for amicus-Defender Assoc. of Philadelphia.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ.

[*123] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ., dissent.