green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Zampogna v. Law Enforcement Health Benefits, Inc.
(2×)
See Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth, 668 A.2d 190 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995), aff 'd, 544 Pa. 512 , 677 A.2d 1206 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See generally Common Cause of Pa. v. Commonwealth, 668 A.2d 190, 199 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995) (reflecting prevailing law which, at least subject to this Court’s future consideration, rejects the inclusion within a general appropriations bill of a special fund appropriation that resides outside of Powell’s reach), aff'd per curiam, 544 Pa. 512 , 677 A.2d 1206 (1996). *306 We also do not overlook that prior decisions have sometimes deemphasized the special apportionment provision of Article III, Section II, either overlooking its role entirely, see, e.g., Powell, 94 A. at 749 (stating that Article I…
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Philadelphia v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See generally Common Cause of Pa. v. Commonwealth, 668 A.2d 190, 197 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995) (describing the “trade-off’ whereby legislative power was restricted by Section 11 in exchange for the exclusion of appropriation bills from the prohibitions of Section 3), aff'd per curiam, 544 Pa. 512 , 677 A.2d 1206 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Nomination Petitions of Owen
(2×)
See, e.g., Common Cause v. Ridge, et al, 668 A.2d 190 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995), aff 'd, 544 Pa. 512 , 677 A.2d 1206 (1996)(declaratory and equitable relief granted prospectively); PNC Bank v. WCAB (Stamos), 831 A.2d 1269 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003)(prospective application of ruling that common law marriage had been abolished).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marcavage v. Rendell
(2×)
See also Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth, 668 A.2d 190 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995), aff'd, 544 Pa. 512 , 677 A.2d 1206 (1996) (holding that the metamorphosis of a bill originally containing only an appropriation from a restricted account in the general fund to the Public Utility Commission into the General Appropriation Act violated Article III, Section 1).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMON CAUSE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania; Thomas J. Ridge, Governor; Catherine Baker Knoll, Treasurer; and North Philadelphia Health Systems, et al. Appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal of Governor, Thomas J. Ridge. Appeal of Biotechnology Foundation, Inc.
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania; Thomas J. Ridge, Governor; Catherine Baker Knoll, Treasurer; and North Philadelphia Health Systems, et al. Appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal of Governor, Thomas J. Ridge. Appeal of Biotechnology Foundation, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 26, 1996.
Per Curiam.
Published
[*513] ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The order of Commonwealth Court is affirmed.
NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.