State v. Joyce, 701 A.2d 336 (Conn. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Joyce, 701 A.2d 336 (Conn. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Lewis (conn, 1998-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lewis (2×)
Conn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Ed. 2d 431 (1994); see State v. Joyce, 45 Conn. App. 390, 402 , 696 A.2d 993 , cert. granted, 243 Conn. 904 , 701 A.2d 336 (1997) (jury instructed that self-defense did not apply if jury “was convinced that the defendant was in the process of robbing the store and that the defendant had killed the victim”); see also State v. Lewis, supra, 220 Conn. 620 (“[t]he defense of self-defense does not encompass a preemptive strike”). 29 “Under this principle, the [defendant] had no entitlement to any self-defense charge.” United States v. Thomas, supra, 48 . “[A] person is not justified i…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Although the legislature has redefined the elements of larceny with respect to specific types of larceny; see, e.g., State v. Foster, 45 Conn. App. 369, 377-78 , 696 A.2d 1003 (specific intent to deprive owner of property not element of larceny by receipt of stolen property under § 53a-119 [8]), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 904 , 701 A.2d 335 (1997); it has not redefined them with respect to larceny as a necessary component of attempt to commit robbery in the first degree. 6 We therefore apply what our courts have recognized as the three essential elements of larceny in resolving the present appea…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Aldrich
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 1062 (1991); see also State v. Foster, 45 Conn. App. 369 , 384 n.17, 696 A.2d 1003 , cert. denied, 243 Conn. 904 , 701 A.2d 335 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DAVID JOYCE
SC 15767.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 1997.
701 A.2d 336
KentDrager, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 390 (AC 15603), is granted, limited to the following issué:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s unconstitutional restriction of the defendant’s right to present evidence of a state witness’ bias against him was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”