Paulus v. Lasala, 746 A.2d 789 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Paulus v. Lasala, 746 A.2d 789 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nation Electrical Contracting, LLC v. St. Dimitrie Romanian Orthodox Church (connappct, 2013-08-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nation Electrical Contracting, LLC v. St. Dimitrie Romanian Orthodox Church
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 148 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 789 (2000). “[T]here is no right to recover interest in a civil action unless a statute provides for interest. ” Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 737 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Travelers Property & Casualty Co. v. Christie (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
III Next, we address the defendant’s argument that, even if the court was correct in finding that D’Amore’s fee was reasonable, the court improperly awarded D’Amore prejudgment interest pursuant to § 37-3a. 12 The traditional rule applicable to this issue is that “[w]here articles are delivered or services performed, and charged on book, and no time of payment agreed on . . . interest would be char geable on such accounts if unreasonably delayed . . . .” Selleck v. French, 1 Conn. 32, 34 , (1814); see Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 147-48 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999) (tracing devel…
discussed Cited "see" Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 153 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999) (“[e]ven if, as the plaintiffs claim, the defendants breached a contract, such a breach is not sufficient to establish a CUTPA violation”), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 789 (2000); Calandro v. Allstate Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Flynn v. Kaumeyer
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Because this claim affects the amount of the judgment for the purposes of the calculation of the § 52-192a interest; See Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 149-51 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 789 (2000); we discuss this claim first.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JOHN D. PAULUS
v.
ANDREW LASALA, JR.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 10, 2000.
746 A.2d 789
James R. Fogarty and Carolyn Alexander Collins, in support of the petition., Alan R. Spirer, in opposition.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 139 (AC 18162), is denied.