Amodio v. Amodio, 754 A.2d 160 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Amodio v. Amodio, 754 A.2d 160 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Monette v. Monette (connappct, 2007-06-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Monette v. Monette (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 470 , 743 A.2d 1135 , cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
cited Cited "see" Medvey v. Medvey
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 470 , 743 A.2d 1135 , cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keusch v. Keusch
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Amodio v. Amodio , 56 Conn. App. 459 , 472, 743 A.2d 1135 ("[t]he plain language of § 46b-86 [a] ... makes clear that if a decree precludes modification ... no modification may be had"), cert. granted, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000), with Guille v. Guille , 196 Conn. 260 , 265, 492 A.2d 175 (1985) (observing that minor children of marriage have right to support, which parents cannot contractually limit, and concluding that "neither the general language of ... § 46b-86 [a] ... nor the decree's broadly phrased nonmodifiability provision, was e…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Although . . . judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application are presumed to apply retroactively . . . this general rule applies to cases that are pending and not to cases that have resulted in final judgments.” 5 (Citation omitted.) Marone v. Waterbury, 244 Conn. 1 , 10—11, 707 A.2d 725 (1998); see also Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 472 , 743 A.2d 1135 , (“[d]ecisional law can apply retroactively only to cases that are pending”), cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Morrison v. Sentence Review Division of the Superior Court
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Although it is true that judgments that are not by their terms limited to prospective application are presumed to apply retroactively; State v. Ryerson, 201 Conn. 333, 339 , 514 A.2d 337 (1986); this general rule applies to cases that are pending and not to cases that have resulted in final judgments.” (Emphasis added.) Marone v. Waterbury, 244 Conn. 1, 10-11 , 707 A.2d 725 (1998); see also Amodio v. Amodio, 56 Conn. App. 459, 472 , 743 A.2d 1135 , cert. granted on other grounds, 253 Conn. 910 , 754 A.2d 160 (2000) (appeal withdrawn September 27, 2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DEBORAH A. AMODIO
v.
VINCENT N. AMODIO
SC 16312.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 18, 2000.
754 A.2d 160
Donald L. Altschuler, in support of the petition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 459 (AC 15692), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[*911] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16312. Donald L. Altschuler, in support of the petition. Decided May 18, 2000

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly exercised its authority under General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) and improperly applied McHugh v. McHugh, 27 Conn. App. 724, 609 A.2d 250 (1992)?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the child support order in this case was nonmodifiable?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.