Squillante Enter., Inc. v. Juck, 777 A.2d 194 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Squillante Enter., Inc. v. Juck, 777 A.2d 194 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Francis (connappct, 2002-04-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Francis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mollo, 63 Conn. App. 487, 491 , 776 A.2d 1176 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 904 , 777 A.2d 194 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lugojanu
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
If the claim is not within one of the categories, then the court must dismiss the claim for a lack of jurisdiction and not consider its merits." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Robles , 169 Conn. App. 127 , 133, 150 A.3d 687 (2016), cert. denied, 324 Conn. 906 , 152 A.3d 544 (2017) ; see also State v. Mollo , 63 Conn. App. 487 , 490, 776 A.2d 1176 ("a sentence imposed within statutory limits is generally not subject to review"), cert. denied, 257 Conn. 904 , 777 A.2d 194 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Henderson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Walzer , 208 Conn. 420 , 424-25, 545 A.2d 559 (1988) ; see also State v. Mollo , 63 Conn.App. 487 , 490, 776 A.2d 1176 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 904 , 777 A.2d 194 (2001) ; State v. Tuszynski , 23 Conn.App. 201 , 206, 579 A.2d 1100 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Koslik (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 158 ; see also State v. Motto, 63 Conn. App. 487, 491 , 776 A.2d 1176 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 904 , 777 A.2d 194 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Delgado
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare State v. Cator, 256 Conn. 785, 804-805 , 781 A.2d 285 (2001) (sentencing court had jurisdiction to consider motion to correct illegal sentence when sentence violated prohibition against double jeopardy) with State v. Mollo, 63 Conn. App. 487, 490-92 , 776 A.2d 1176 (trial court properly determined it lacked jurisdiction to consider defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence when claim of illegality centered on defect in factual basis of plea), cert. denied, 257 Conn. 904 , 777 A.2d 194 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tabone
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Walzer, 208 Conn. 420, 424-25 , 545 A.2d 559 (1988); see also State v. Mollo, 63 Conn. App. 487, 490 , 776 A.2d 1176 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 904 , 777 A.2d 194 (2001); State v. Tuszynski, 23 *534 Conn. App. 201, 206, 579 A.2d 1100 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mitchell v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Robinson v. Commissioner of Correction, 62 Conn. App. 429, 435-36 , 771 A.2d 952 (court abused discretion in denying petition for certification to appeal from denial of petition for writ based on ineffective assistance of counsel because whether counsel should have applied for youthful offender treatment was debatable among reasonable jurists), cert. denied, 257 Conn. 902 , 777 A.2d 194 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cobham v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Walzer, 208 Conn. 420, 424-25 , 545 A.2d 559 (1988); see also State v. Mollo, 63 Conn. App. 487, 490 , 776 A.2d 1176 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 904 , 777 A.2d 194 (2001); State v. Tuszynski, 23 Conn. App. 201, 206 , 579 A.2d 1100 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SQUILLANTE ENTERPRISES, INC.
v.
JOZEF JUCK
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 5, 2001.
777 A.2d 194
JozefJuck, pro se, in support of the petition., Myra L. Graubard, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 907 (AC 20976), is denied.

JozefJuck, pro se, in support of the petition. Myra L. Graubard, in opposition. Decided July 5, 2001