green
Positive treatment
8.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Thibodeau v. American Baptist Churches
“Under both the free exercise clause and the establishment clause, the first amendment prohibits civil courts from resolving disputed issues of religious doctrine and practice.” Id., 880.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Anderson
See Bee v. Bee, 79 Conn. App. 783, 791 , 831 A.2d 833 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003), overruled in part on other grounds by Tuckman v. Tuckman, 308 Conn. 194 , 202 n.6, 61 A.3d 449 (2013). ‘‘The general rule of law known as the American rule is that attorney’s fees and ordinary expenses and burdens of litigation are not allowed to the successful party absent a contractual or statutory exception. . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Escourse v. 100 Taylor Avenue, LLC
See DeCorso v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc., 78 Conn. App. 865, 871 , 829 A.2d 38 (‘‘[i]f the affidavits and the other supporting documents are inadequate, then the court is justified in granting the summary judgment’’ [internal quotation marks omit- ted]), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 931 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Tuckman v. Tuckman
See Bee v. Bee, 79 Conn. App. 783, 787 , 831 A.2d 833 , cert, denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sutherland v. Sutherland
See Bee v. Bee, 79 Conn. App. 783, 798-99 , 831 A.2d 833 (construction of judgment is question of law for court and determinative factor is intention of court as gathered from all parts of judgment), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003). 2 The magistrate issued his original memorandum of decision on April 29, 2005.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. DeVivo
See Bee v. Bee, 79 Conn. App. 783, 798-99 , 831 A.2d 833 (construction of judgment is question of law for court and determinative factor is intention of court as gathered from all parts of judgment), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003). 2 Despite having served his sentence, the defendant’s appeal is not moot because the defendant may be subject to collateral legal consequences as a result of the conviction.
discussed
Cited "see"
DeOliveira v. PMG Land Associates, L.P.
See Bee v. Bee, 79 Conn. App. 783, 798-99 , 831 A.2d 833 (construction of judgment is question of law for court and determinative factor is intention of court as gathered from all parts of judgment), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CASSOTTO v. Aeschliman
See, e.g., DeCorso v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc., 78 Conn. App. 865, 873, 829 A.2d 38 (no recovery in tort for alleged actions that occurred more than three years prior to suit), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 931 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003); Novak v. Omega Plastics Corp., 60 Conn. App. 424, 428 , 760 A.2d 137 (no recovery in contract for services performed more than six years before action brought), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 910 , 763 A.2d 1035 (2000).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Marshall v. Marshall
Id., 819-20 ; see, e.g., Bee v. Bee, 79 Conn. App. 783, 796-97 , 831 A.2d 833 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 805 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JUAN PEREZ
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 2, 2003.
James M. Fox, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Published
The petitioner Juan Perez’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 96 (AC 23630), is denied.